Marie-Aude Vitrani1,2,3, Anja Marx4,5,6,7, R Zvan Iordache8, Serge Muller8, Guillaume Morel9,10,11. 1. UMR 7222, ISIR, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Paris, France. marie-aude.vitrani@upmc.fr. 2. INSERM, U1150, Agathe-ISIR, 75005, Paris, France. marie-aude.vitrani@upmc.fr. 3. CNRS, UMR 7222, ISIR, 75005, Paris, France. marie-aude.vitrani@upmc.fr. 4. UMR 7222, ISIR, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Paris, France. marx@isir.upmc.fr. 5. INSERM, U1150, Agathe-ISIR, 75005, Paris, France. marx@isir.upmc.fr. 6. CNRS, UMR 7222, ISIR, 75005, Paris, France. marx@isir.upmc.fr. 7. GE Healthcare, Buc, France. marx@isir.upmc.fr. 8. GE Healthcare, Buc, France. 9. UMR 7222, ISIR, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Paris, France. morel@isir.upmc.fr. 10. INSERM, U1150, Agathe-ISIR, 75005, Paris, France. morel@isir.upmc.fr. 11. CNRS, UMR 7222, ISIR, 75005, Paris, France. morel@isir.upmc.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This research is situated in the context of breast cancer detection where the standard procedure is the succession of an initial mammography (MX) examination and a supplementary ultrasound (US) scan. One major difficulty of this procedure results from the fact that breast geometry changes between both examinations due to different patient's positions. The proposed system facilitates this combined examination by keeping the breast geometry and by adding a US probe guidance robot to the mammography system. METHODS: A comanipulation system is set up where the robot and user simultaneously manipulate the probe toward the target previously localized in MX images. Calibration procedures and robot control are detailed. RESULTS: A test protocol was presented to conduct two tests that are both related to the medical application. The first tests aim at evaluating robot guidance for localizing a lesion which was previously defined in the X-ray images. The second tests aim at quantifying robot influence when scanning a target lesion. The studied task consists of a pointing/scanning exercise, where the US beam intersects a breast lesion. CONCLUSIONS: The experiments show a significant increase in examination quality when using robot guidance as compared to the nonassisted examination.
PURPOSE: This research is situated in the context of breast cancer detection where the standard procedure is the succession of an initial mammography (MX) examination and a supplementary ultrasound (US) scan. One major difficulty of this procedure results from the fact that breast geometry changes between both examinations due to different patient's positions. The proposed system facilitates this combined examination by keeping the breast geometry and by adding a US probe guidance robot to the mammography system. METHODS: A comanipulation system is set up where the robot and user simultaneously manipulate the probe toward the target previously localized in MX images. Calibration procedures and robot control are detailed. RESULTS: A test protocol was presented to conduct two tests that are both related to the medical application. The first tests aim at evaluating robot guidance for localizing a lesion which was previously defined in the X-ray images. The second tests aim at quantifying robot influence when scanning a target lesion. The studied task consists of a pointing/scanning exercise, where the US beam intersects a breast lesion. CONCLUSIONS: The experiments show a significant increase in examination quality when using robot guidance as compared to the nonassisted examination.
Entities:
Keywords:
Assisted gesture; Breast cancer detection; Comanipulation; Human–robot collaboration
Authors: Ajay Kapur; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Eberhard; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Kai Thomenius; Murtuza Lokhandwalla; Donald Buckley; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Ramon Q Erkamp; Heang-Ping Chan; J Brian Fowlkes; Jerry A Thomas; Cynthia E Landberg Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2004-08
Authors: Rebecca C Booi; Jochen F Krücker; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Matthew O'Donnell; Ajay Kapur; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Marilyn A Roubidoux; J Brian Fowlkes; Paul L Carson Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272