Literature DB >> 11014255

Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography.

W Buchberger1, A Niehoff, P Obrist, P DeKoekkoek-Doll, M Dünser.   

Abstract

With recent significant advances in ultrasound technology, the potential of high-resolution sonography to improve the sensitivity of cancer diagnosis in women with dense breasts has become a matter of interest for breast imagers. To determine how often physician-performed high-resolution sonography can detect nonpalpable breast cancers that are not revealed by mammography, 8,970 women with breast density grades 2 through 4 underwent high-resolution sonography as an adjunct to mammography. All sonographically detected, clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions that were not simple cysts were prospectively classified into benign, indeterminate, or malignant categories. Diagnoses were confirmed by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, core-needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy. In 8,103 women with normal findings at mammography and physical examination, 32 cancers and 330 benign lesions were detected in 273 patients with sonography only. Eight additional cancers were found in 867 patients with a malignant (n = 5) or a benign (n = 3) palpable or mammographically detected index lesion. The overall prevalence of cancers detected with screening sonography was 0.41%, and the proportion of sonographically detected cancers to the total number of nonpalpable cancers was 22%. The mean size of invasive cancers detected only by sonography was 9.1 mm, and was not statistically different from the mean size of invasive cancers detected by mammography. The sensitivity of prospective sonographic classification for malignancy was 100%, and the specificity was 31%. In conclusion, the use of high-resolution sonography as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts may lead to detection of a significant number of otherwise occult cancers that are no different in size from nonpalpable mammographically detected cancers. Prospective classification of these lesions based on sonographic characteristics resulted in an acceptable benign-to-malignant biopsy rate of 6.3:1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11014255     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2171(00)90027-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR        ISSN: 0887-2171            Impact factor:   1.875


  43 in total

1.  Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ajay Kapur; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Eberhard; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Kai Thomenius; Murtuza Lokhandwalla; Donald Buckley; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Ramon Q Erkamp; Heang-Ping Chan; J Brian Fowlkes; Jerry A Thomas; Cynthia E Landberg
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08

2.  [3D ultrasound (3D US) in the diagnosis of focal breast lesions].

Authors:  D Kotsianos; S Wirth; T Fischer; K Hiltawsky; H Sittek; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Incorporating new imaging models in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Denise H Reddy; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

4.  Establishment of seminars to improve the diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Eriko Tohno; Kiyoshi Sawai; Kazuhiro Shimamoto; Ei Ueno; Tokiko Endou; Hiroko Tsunoda-Shimizu; Hideaki Shirai; Etsuo Takada
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Breast Sonography - 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography?

Authors:  Christian Weismann; Christian Mayr; Heike Egger; Alena Auer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  [Sonographically guided, minimally invasive biopsy of uncertain mammary lesions. Clinical experience with a new biopsy system].

Authors:  H Sittek; A Wieser; M Kessler; S Britsch; C Vick; M Untch; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Earlier detection of breast cancer with ultrasound molecular imaging in a transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  Sunitha V Bachawal; Kristin C Jensen; Amelie M Lutz; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Francois Tranquart; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Breast cancer incidence and mortality in Tyrol/Austria after fifteen years of opportunistic mammography screening.

Authors:  Willi Oberaigner; Wolfgang Buchberger; Thomas Frede; Rudolf Knapp; Christian Marth; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone.

Authors:  Ayumi Izumori; Koji Takebe; Akira Sato
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.