Literature DB >> 18297415

Screen positive rates among six family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer in four cohorts of women.

Monica R McClain1, Glenn E Palomaki, Heather Hampel, Judith A Westman, James E Haddow.   

Abstract

It has been estimated that approximately 2% of the general population has a family history that is indicative of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. We aim to further document the proportions of women identified by several protocols as having a positive family history of breast/ovarian cancer, as a prelude to offering genetic counseling and BRCA1/2 mutation testing. This is a critical component of the evidence base needed when considering implementation of family history screening in primary care. We apply six separate family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer to four cohorts of women, 21 to 55 years of age, for whom self-reported personal, and first and second degree family histories of breast/ovarian cancer have been obtained. We analyzed family history for 3,073 women in the four cohorts. The screen positive rates among the protocols vary widely both within and among the cohorts. In Cohort 4, the screen positive rate ranges between 6.9% to 20.8%, depending on the protocol. Applying one of the protocols to the four cohorts yields screen positive rates between 5.0% and 16.7%. The proportion of women that is screen positive on all six protocols (or three, if Ashkenazi Jewish) ranges from 1.9% to 4.0%. Used alone, none of the recommended family history protocols yields an acceptable screen positive rate. A more acceptable 2% to 4% screen positive rate can be expected when all six protocols agree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297415     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9188-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  17 in total

1.  Acceptability of computer assessments among ethnically diverse, low-income smokers.

Authors:  B Bock; R Niaura; A Fontes; F Bock
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1999 May-Jun

2.  Adjusting the estimated proportion of breast cancer cases associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: public health implications.

Authors:  Monica R McClain; Glenn E Palomaki; Katherine L Nathanson; James E Haddow
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Reactions of GPs to a triage-controlled referral system for cancer genetics.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Rachel Iredale; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer.

Authors:  J Peto; N Collins; R Barfoot; S Seal; W Warren; N Rahman; D F Easton; C Evans; J Deacon; M R Stratton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-06-02       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Will patients use a computer to give a medical history?

Authors:  J E Dugaw; K Civello; C Chuinard; G N Jones
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Evaluation of hereditary risk in a mammography population.

Authors:  Julie L Jones; Kevin S Hughes; Daniel B Kopans; Richard H Moore; Marissa Howard-McNatt; Sherwood S Hughes; Nancy Y Lee; Constance A Roche; Nancy Siegel; Michele A Gadd; Barbara L Smith; James S Michaelson
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing--Atlanta, Denver, Raleigh-Durham, and Seattle, 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Prevalence of family history of breast and ovarian cancer in a single primary care practice using a self-administered questionnaire.

Authors:  Kevin S Hughes; Constance Roche; Curtis T Campbell; Nancy Siegel; Lisa Salisbury; Amy Chekos; Maya S Katz; Erica Edell
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Usability of a computer-assisted interview system for the unaided self-entry of patient data in an urban rheumatology clinic.

Authors:  Carl A Williams; Thomas Templin; Angelia D Mosley-Williams
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Computer interviewing in a primary care office: the patients are ready.

Authors:  Paul D Smith; Michael Grasmick
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004
View more
  6 in total

1.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Flore Laforest; Pia Kirkegaard; Baljinder Mann; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Exploring hereditary cancer among dying cancer patients--a cross-sectional study of hereditary risk and perceived awareness of DNA testing and banking.

Authors:  John Martin Quillin; Joann N Bodurtha; Laura A Siminoff; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Prevalence and healthcare actions of women in a large health system with a family history meeting the 2005 USPSTF recommendation for BRCA genetic counseling referral.

Authors:  Cecelia A Bellcross; Steven Leadbetter; Sharon Hensley Alford; Lucy A Peipins
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Guidelines for genetic risk assessment of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: early disagreements and low utilization.

Authors:  Douglas E Levy; Judy E Garber; Alexandra E Shields
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Identification of women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in a sample of 1000 Slovenian women: a comparison of guidelines.

Authors:  Urska Kotnik; Borut Peterlin; Luca Lovrecic
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Knowledge, Attitudes, Willingness to Pay, and Patient Preferences About Genetic Testing and Subsequent Risk Management for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Jacqueline M Hirth; Erika L Fuchs; Leslie E Cofie; Veronica Brown; Yong-Fang Kuo; Maria E Fernandez; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.037

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.