Literature DB >> 15246755

The motion-induced position shift depends on the perceived direction of bistable quartet motion.

Won Mok Shim1, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

Motion can influence the perceived position of nearby stationary objects (Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 954). To investigate the influence of high-level motion processes on the position shift while controlling for low-level motion signals, we measured the position shift as a function of the motion seen in a bistable quartet. In this stimulus, motion can be seen along either one or the other of two possible paths. An illusory position shift was observed only when the flashes were adjacent to the path where motion was perceived. If the flash was adjacent to the other path, where no motion was perceived, there was no illusory displacement. Thus for the same physical stimulus, a change in the perceived motion path determined the location where illusory position shifts would be seen. This result indicates that high-level motion processes alone are sufficient to produce the position shift of stationary objects. The effect of the timing of the test flash between the onset and offset of the motion was also examined. The position shifts were greatest at the onset of motion, then decreasing gradually, disappearing at the offset of motion. We propose an attentional repulsion explanation for the shift effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15246755     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Authors:  Taiki Fukiage; David Whitney; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Visual motion due to eye movements helps guide the hand.

Authors:  David Whitney; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Ozgur Yilmaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Mislocalization of a target toward subjective contours: attentional modulation of location signals.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Takahiro Kawabe; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-02-28

7.  Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization.

Authors:  Peter U Tse; David Whitney; Stuart Anstis; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The motion-induced shift in the perceived location of a grating also shifts its aftereffect.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Gerrit W Maus; Stuart Anstis; Patrick Cavanagh; Peter U Tse; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Illusory motion and mislocalization of temporally offset target in apparent motion display.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Masayoshi Nagai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-19

10.  Retrospective perceptual distortion of position representation does not lead to delayed localization.

Authors:  Ricky K C Au; Fuminori Ono; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.