Literature DB >> 21415228

Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization.

Peter U Tse1, David Whitney, Stuart Anstis, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

When a test is flashed on top of two superimposed, opposing motions, the perceived location of the test is shifted in opposite directions depending on which of the two motions is attended. Because the stimulus remains unchanged as attention switches from one motion to the other, the effect cannot be due to stimulus-driven, low-level motion. A control condition ruled out any contribution from possible attention-induced cyclotorsion of the eyes. This provides the strongest evidence to date for a role of attention in the perception of location, and establishes that what we attend to influences where we perceive objects to be. © ARVO

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21415228      PMCID: PMC3575214          DOI: 10.1167/11.3.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  44 in total

1.  The duration of 3-d form analysis in transformational apparent motion.

Authors:  Peter Ulric Tse; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

2.  Perceived shifts of flashed stimuli by visible and invisible object motion.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Takashi R Sato; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Attention-based motion perception.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Position shifts following crowded second-order motion adaptation reveal processing of local and global motion without awareness.

Authors:  Thomas D Harp; David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The perception of surface curvature from optical motion.

Authors:  V J Perotti; J T Todd; J S Lappin; F Phillips
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-04

7.  Mechanisms underlying the perceived angular velocity of a rigidly rotating object.

Authors:  G P Caplovitz; P-J Hsieh; P U Tse
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion.

Authors:  O J Braddick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Amelia R Hunt; Arash Afraz; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  The perception of structure from visual motion in monkey and man.

Authors:  R M Siegel; R A Andersen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  9 in total

1.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing.

Authors:  Taiki Fukiage; David Whitney; Ikuya Murakami
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The motion-induced shift in the perceived location of a grating also shifts its aftereffect.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Gerrit W Maus; Stuart Anstis; Patrick Cavanagh; Peter U Tse; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The flash grab effect.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh; Stuart Anstis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Motion-dependent representation of space in area MT+.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Illusory motion and mislocalization of temporally offset target in apparent motion display.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Masayoshi Nagai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-19

6.  Color improves speed of processing but not perception in a motion illusion.

Authors:  Carolyn J Perry; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-29

7.  Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing.

Authors:  Zenon Mathews; Ryszard Cetnarski; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-30

8.  Action can amplify motion-induced illusory displacement.

Authors:  Franck Caniard; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Motion-Induced Position Shifts Activate Early Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Peter J Kohler; Patrick Cavanagh; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.