Literature DB >> 17333256

Mislocalization of a target toward subjective contours: attentional modulation of location signals.

Yuki Yamada1, Takahiro Kawabe, Kayo Miura.   

Abstract

This study examined whether a briefly presented target was mislocalized toward a subjective contour. Observers manually reproduced the position of a briefly presented peripheral target circle above a central fixation cross. A luminance contour, a subjective contour, or a no-contour stimulus was presented in either the left of right visual field, and a no-contour control was presented in the opposite visual field. After these stimuli vanished, a target circle was then presented. Consequently, the degree of mislocalization toward the subjective and luminance contours was the same; this indicated that image integration at a coarse spatial scale cannot explain mislocalization. Experiment 2 revealed that the mislocalization in Experiment 1 was not a result of eye movements. Experiment 3 found that the spatial attention allocated at the location of the luminance and subjective contours was more than that allocated at the no-contour stimulus. An attentional shift toward the task-irrelevant stimulus resulted in a mislocalization of the target.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17333256     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0109-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  32 in total

1.  Spatial distortions induced by multiple visual landmarks: how local distortions combine to produce complex distortion patterns.

Authors:  Thomas Schmidt; Steffen Werner; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-08

2.  Compression of space in visual memory.

Authors:  B R Sheth; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attention shift not memory averaging reduces foveal bias.

Authors:  Muhammad Kamal Uddin; Takahiro Kawabe; Sachio Nakamizo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Differential roles of distracters in reflexive and memory-based localization.

Authors:  Muhammad Kamal Uddin; Takahiro Kawabe; Sachio Nakamizo
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2005

5.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force.

Authors:  T L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

7.  'Where' and 'what' in visual search.

Authors:  J Atkinson; O J Braddick
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Illusory localization of stimuli flashed in the dark before saccades.

Authors:  J Schlag; M Schlag-Rey
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  Attention alters feature space in motion processing.

Authors:  Marc Zirnsak; Fred H Hamker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  When here becomes there: attentional distribution modulates foveal bias in peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Invalidly cued targets are well localized when detected.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Junjun Zhang; Sarah Shomstein; Joseph C Nah; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Exploring the edges of visual space: the influence of visual boundaries on peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Shradha Sanghvi; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Mislocalization of visual stimuli: independent effects of static and dynamic attention.

Authors:  Sung-en Chien; Fuminori Ono; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Retrospective perceptual distortion of position representation does not lead to delayed localization.

Authors:  Ricky K C Au; Fuminori Ono; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-03-15

8.  Appraisal of space words and allocation of emotion words in bodily space.

Authors:  Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos; María Rosa Elosúa; Yuki Yamada; Nicholas Francis Hamm; Kimihiro Noguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.