Literature DB >> 1538787

Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles.

R Lüthy1, J U Bowie, D Eisenberg.   

Abstract

As methods for determining protein three-dimensional (3D) structure develop, a continuing problem is how to verify that the final protein model is correct. The revision of several protein models to correct errors has prompted the development of new criteria for judging the validity of X-ray and NMR structures, as well as the formation of energetic and empirical methods to evaluate the correctness of protein models. The challenge is to distinguish between a mistraced or wrongly folded model, and one that is basically correct, but not adequately refined. We show that an effective test of the accuracy of a 3D protein model is a comparison of the model to its own amino-acid sequence, using a 3D profile, computed from the atomic coordinates of the structure 3D profiles of correct protein structures match their own sequences with high scores. In contrast, 3D profiles for protein models known to be wrong score poorly. An incorrectly modelled segment in an otherwise correct structure can be identified by examining the profile score in a moving-window scan. The accuracy of a protein model can be assessed by its 3D profile, regardless of whether the model has been derived by X-ray, NMR or computational procedures.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1538787     DOI: 10.1038/356083a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  862 in total

1.  MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models.

Authors:  R Sánchez; U Pieper; N Mirković; P I de Bakker; E Wittenstein; A Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Refinement of modelled structures by knowledge-based energy profiles and secondary structure prediction: application to the human procarboxypeptidase A2.

Authors:  P Aloy; J M Mas; M A Martí-Renom; E Querol; F X Avilés; B Oliva
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Scoring functions in protein folding and design.

Authors:  R I Dima; J R Banavar; A Maritan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  A functional genetic screen identifies regions at the C-terminal tail and death-domain of death-associated protein kinase that are critical for its proapoptotic activity.

Authors:  T Raveh; H Berissi; M Eisenstein; T Spivak; A Kimchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Modeling Pseudomonas syringae ice-nucleation protein as a beta-helical protein.

Authors:  S P Graether; Z Jia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Modeling of loops in protein structures.

Authors:  A Fiser; R K Do; A Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a family of designed sequences.

Authors:  Patrice Koehl; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Roberto Sánchez; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Conversion of monomeric protein L to an obligate dimer by computational protein design.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; J W O'Neill; D E Kim; K Y Zhang; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Modeling of the structural features of integral-membrane proteins reverse-environment prediction of integral membrane protein structure (REPIMPS).

Authors:  S Dastmalchi; M B Morris; W B Church
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.