Literature DB >> 10328272

Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes.

G Moont1, H A Gabb, M J Sternberg.   

Abstract

Empirical residue-residue pair potentials are used to screen possible complexes for protein-protein dockings. A correct docking is defined as a complex with not more than 2.5 A root-mean-square distance from the known experimental structure. The complexes were generated by "ftdock" (Gabb et al. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120) that ranks using shape complementarity. The complexes studied were 5 enzyme-inhibitors and 2 antibody-antigens, starting from the unbound crystallographic coordinates, with a further 2 antibody-antigens where the antibody was from the bound crystallographic complex. The pair potential functions tested were derived both from observed intramolecular pairings in a database of nonhomologous protein domains, and from observed intermolecular pairings across the interfaces in sets of nonhomologous heterodimers and homodimers. Out of various alternate strategies, we found the optimal method used a mole-fraction calculated random model from the intramolecular pairings. For all the systems, a correct docking was placed within the top 12% of the pair potential score ranked complexes. A combined strategy was developed that incorporated "multidock," a side-chain refinement algorithm (Jackson et al. J Mol Biol 1998;276:265-285). This placed a correct docking within the top 5 complexes for enzyme-inhibitor systems, and within the top 40 complexes for antibody-antigen systems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10328272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  78 in total

1.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Robert B Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Electrostatic contributions to protein-protein interactions: fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis.

Authors:  R Norel; F Sheinerman; D Petrey; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions.

Authors:  David M Lorber; Maria K Udo; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Long Lu; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Structure of the extracellular domains of the human interleukin-6 receptor alpha -chain.

Authors:  J N Varghese; R L Moritz; M-Z Lou; A Van Donkelaar; H Ji; N Ivancic; K M Branson; N E Hall; R J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility.

Authors:  Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Sequence conservation in the chagasin family suggests a common trend in cysteine proteinase binding by unrelated protein inhibitors.

Authors:  Daniel J Rigden; Vladimir V Mosolov; Michael Y Galperin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  The dependence of all-atom statistical potentials on structural training database.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.