Literature DB >> 22004759

GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.

Hongyi Zhou1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

An accurate scoring function is a key component for successful protein structure prediction. To address this important unsolved problem, we develop a generalized orientation and distance-dependent all-atom statistical potential. The new statistical potential, generalized orientation-dependent all-atom potential (GOAP), depends on the relative orientation of the planes associated with each heavy atom in interacting pairs. GOAP is a generalization of previous orientation-dependent potentials that consider only representative atoms or blocks of side-chain or polar atoms. GOAP is decomposed into distance- and angle-dependent contributions. The DFIRE distance-scaled finite ideal gas reference state is employed for the distance-dependent component of GOAP. GOAP was tested on 11 commonly used decoy sets containing 278 targets, and recognized 226 native structures as best from the decoys, whereas DFIRE recognized 127 targets. The major improvement comes from decoy sets that have homology-modeled structures that are close to native (all within ∼4.0 Å) or from the ROSETTA ab initio decoy set. For these two kinds of decoys, orientation-independent DFIRE or only side-chain orientation-dependent RWplus performed poorly. Although the OPUS-PSP block-based orientation-dependent, side-chain atom contact potential performs much better (recognizing 196 targets) than DFIRE, RWplus, and dDFIRE, it is still ∼15% worse than GOAP. Thus, GOAP is a promising advance in knowledge-based, all-atom statistical potentials. GOAP is available for download at http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/GOAP.
Copyright © 2011 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004759      PMCID: PMC3192975          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  51 in total

1.  A distance-dependent atomic knowledge-based potential for improved protein structure selection.

Authors:  H Lu; J Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

2.  Quantifying the effect of burial of amino acid residues on protein stability.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-02-01

Review 3.  Force fields for protein simulations.

Authors:  Jay W Ponder; David A Case
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2003

4.  Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment.

Authors:  Bino John; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Development of novel statistical potentials for protein fold recognition.

Authors:  N-V Buchete; J E Straub; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-12-01

7.  Geometric cooperativity and anticooperativity of three-body interactions in native proteins.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Jie Liang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-07-01

8.  OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions.

Authors:  Yinghao Wu; Mingyang Lu; Mingzhi Chen; Jialin Li; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Silvio C E Tosatto; Dietmar Schomburg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-04

10.  Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Allison N Tegge; Jianlin Cheng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-05-15
View more
  103 in total

1.  A robust algorithm for optimizing protein structures with NMR chemical shifts.

Authors:  Mark Berjanskii; David Arndt; Yongjie Liang; David S Wishart
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Integration of QUARK and I-TASSER for Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction in CASP11.

Authors:  Wenxuan Zhang; Jianyi Yang; Baoji He; Sara Elizabeth Walker; Hongjiu Zhang; Brandon Govindarajoo; Jouko Virtanen; Zhidong Xue; Hong-Bin Shen; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-23

3.  Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops.

Authors:  Guang Qiang Dong; Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Ben Webb; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Template-based and free modeling of I-TASSER and QUARK pipelines using predicted contact maps in CASP12.

Authors:  Chengxin Zhang; S M Mortuza; Baoji He; Yanting Wang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-14

5.  Deep-learning contact-map guided protein structure prediction in CASP13.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Yang Li; Chengxin Zhang; Robin Pearce; S M Mortuza; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-14

6.  Multi-Dimensional Scaling and MODELLER-Based Evolutionary Algorithms for Protein Model Refinement.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Yi Shang; Dong Xu
Journal:  Proc Congr Evol Comput       Date:  2014-07

7.  OPUS-SSF: A side-chain-inclusive scoring function for ranking protein structural models.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Tianqi Ma; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Refining protein structures using enhanced sampling techniques with restraints derived from an ensemble-based model.

Authors:  Tianqi Ma; Tianwu Zang; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model.

Authors:  Ivan Anishchenko; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Improving low-accuracy protein structures using enhanced sampling techniques.

Authors:  Tianwu Zang; Tianqi Ma; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.