Literature DB >> 15172547

Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading.

Sébastien Miellet1, Laurent Sparrow.   

Abstract

This experiment employed the boundary paradigm during sentence reading to explore the nature of early phonological coding in reading. Fixation durations were shorter when the parafoveal preview was the correct word than when it was a spelling control pseudoword. In contrast, there was no significant difference between correct word and pseudohomophone previews. These results suggest that the phonological codes are assembled before word fixation and are used for lexical access. Moreover, there was evidence that orthographic codes influence the activation of word meaning. We found that fixation durations were shorter for orthographically similar parafoveal previews, and this orthographic priming effect is limited to pseudohomophones. Thus, it seems that both the orthographic and the phonological similarities of the parafoveal preview to the target play a part in the facilitative effects of the preview.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172547     DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00442-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  21 in total

Review 1.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  The time course of phonological and orthographic processing of acronyms in reading: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Alexander Pollatsek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

3.  Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Transposition effects in reading Japanese Kana: are they orthographic in nature?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Chie Nakatani; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

5.  Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: making a case for case.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Elizabeth R Schotter; Raymond W Berry; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

7.  Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Xinyue Zhou; Sébastien Miellet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Annie Jia
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Phonological and orthographic cues enhance the processing of inflectional morphology. ERP evidence from L1 and L2 French.

Authors:  Haydee Carrasco-Ortiz; Cheryl Frenck-Mestre
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-13

10.  Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers.

Authors:  Nathalie N Bélanger; Rachel I Mayberry; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.