Literature DB >> 17048723

The time course of phonological and orthographic processing of acronyms in reading: evidence from eye movements.

Timothy J Slattery1, Alexander Pollatsek, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

The present experiment presented acronyms preceded by either a or an in a sentence. The key stimuli were acronyms that begin with a consonant such as F, whose letter name begins with a vowel sound, or with the vowel U, whose letter name begins with a consonant sound. The durations of first fixations were influenced solely by phonology: For example, a FBI caused as much disruption (relative to an FBI) as did an CIA (relative to a CIA). Somewhat later processing (most notably go-past time and total time) was influenced by orthography as well, as combinations such as an FBI had longer processing times than did combinations such as a CIA. Although the initial coding of visual stimuli must proceed from an orthographic code to a phonological one, these data indicate that the phonological representation of the acronym is the primary initial code that makes contact with the article that precedes it and suggest that the initial contact with the sentence context is phonological.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17048723     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

1.  Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  Y A Lee; K S Binder; J O Kim; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The role of phonological codes in integrating information across saccadic eye movements in Chinese character identification.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; L H Tan; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences.

Authors:  Weimin Liu; Albrecht W Inhoff; Yun Ye; Caili Wu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Laurent Sparrow
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; M Lesch; R K Morris; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: effects of reading skill.

Authors:  Kathryn H Chace; Keith Rayner; Arnold D Well
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2005-09

7.  Use of phonological codes for Chinese characters: evidence from processing of parafoveal preview when reading sentences.

Authors:  Jie-Li Tsai; Chia-Ying Lee; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Nai-Shing Yen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Phonological codes and eye movements in reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; A Pollatsek; K S Binder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Is it a letter? Is it a number? Processing of numbers within SMS shortcuts.

Authors:  Lesya Y Ganushchak; Andrea Krott; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

3.  Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: making a case for case.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Elizabeth R Schotter; Raymond W Berry; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Combined ERP/fMRI evidence for early word recognition effects in the posterior inferior temporal gyrus.

Authors:  Joseph Dien; Eric S Brian; Dennis L Molfese; Brian T Gold
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Survival analyses reveal how early phonological processing affects eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  From gr8 to great: Lexical Access to SMS Shortcuts.

Authors:  Lesya Y Ganushchak; Andrea Krott; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.