Literature DB >> 15168237

Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading.

Deed E Harrison1, Christopher J Colloca, Donald D Harrison, Tadeusz J Janik, Jason W Haas, Tony S Keller.   

Abstract

In the absence of external forces, the largest contributor to intervertebral disc (IVD) loads and stresses is trunk muscular activity. The relationship between trunk posture, spine geometry, extensor muscle activity, and the loads and stresses acting on the IVD is not well understood. The objective of this study was to characterize changes in thoracolumbar disc loads and extensor muscle forces following anterior translation of the thoracic spine in the upright posture. Vertebral body geometries (C2 to S1) and the location of the femoral head and acetabulum centroids were obtained by digitizing lateral, full-spine radiographs of 13 men and five women volunteers without previous history of back pain. Two standing, lateral, full-spine radiographic views were obtained for each subject: a neutral-posture lateral radiograph and a radiograph during anterior translation of the thorax relative to the pelvis (while keeping T1 aligned over T12). Extensor muscle loads, and compression and shear stresses acting on the IVDs, were calculated for each posture using a previously validated biomechanical model. Comparing vertebral centroids for the neutral posture to the anterior posture, subjects were able to anterior translate +101.5 mm+/-33.0 mm (C7-hip axis), +81.5 mm+/-39.2 mm (C7-S1) (vertebral centroid of C7 compared with a vertical line through the vertebral centroid of S1), and +58.9 mm+/-19.1 mm (T12-S1). In the anterior translated posture, disc loads and stresses were significantly increased for all levels below T9. Increases in IVD compressive loads and shear loads, and the corresponding stresses, were most marked at the L5-S1 level and L3-L4 level, respectively. The extensor muscle loads required to maintain static equilibrium in the upright posture increased from 147.2 N (mean, neutral posture) to 667.1 N (mean, translated posture) at L5-S1. Compressive loads on the anterior and posterior L5-S1 disc nearly doubled in the anterior translated posture. Anterior translation of the thorax resulted in significantly increased loads and stresses acting on the thoracolumbar spine. This posture is common in lumbar spinal disorders and could contribute to lumbar disc pathologies, progression of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis deformities, and poor outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. In conclusion, anterior trunk translation in the standing subject increases extensor muscle activity and loads and stresses acting on the intervertebral disc in the lower thoracic and lumbar regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15168237      PMCID: PMC3476747          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0734-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  43 in total

1.  The effect of hydrostatic pressure on intervertebral disc metabolism.

Authors:  W C Hutton; W A Elmer; S D Boden; S Hyon; Y Toribatake; K Tomita; G A Hair
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Height change caused by creep in intervertebral discs: a sagittal plane model.

Authors:  T S Keller; M Nathan
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-08

3.  Effects of specimen length on the monosegmental motion behavior of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Kettler; H J Wilke; C Haid; L Claes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; R M Havey; A J Ghanayem; H Diener; K P Meade; B Dunlap; S D Hodges
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  2000 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies: Monitoring in vivo implant loads with a telemeterized internal spinal fixation device.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; F Graichen; U Weber; G Bergmann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Load-bearing and stress analysis of the human spine under a novel wrapping compression loading.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  THE INFLUENCE OF SPINAL MOVEMENTS ON THE LUMBAR INTRADISCAL PRESSURE AND ON THE TENSIL STRESSES IN THE ANNULUS FIBROSUS.

Authors:  A NACHEMSON
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1963

8.  In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems.

Authors:  K Sato; S Kikuchi; T Yonezawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Influence of load carrying on loads in internal spinal fixators.

Authors:  A Rohlmann; F Graichen; G Bergmann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance).

Authors:  K C Booth; K H Bridwell; L G Lenke; C R Baldus; K M Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2005.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-12

3.  Gravitational forces and sagittal shape of the spine. Clinical estimation of their relations.

Authors:  J Legaye; G Duval-Beaupere
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Development and Validation of a Musculoskeletal Model of the Fully Articulated Thoracolumbar Spine and Rib Cage.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Exercise-induced muscle damage on the contractile properties of the lumbar paraspinal muscles: a laser displacement mechanomyographic approach.

Authors:  Christian Than; Llion Roberts; Brooke K Coombes; Danijel Tosovic; J Mark Brown
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Spinal posture of thoracic and lumbar spine and pelvic tilt in highly trained cyclists.

Authors:  José M Muyor; Pedro A López-Miñarro; Fernando Alacid
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis--a test of the 'vicious cycle' pathogenetic hypothesis: summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; R Geoffrey Burwell; Peter H Dangerfield
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-10-18

8.  Risk Factors of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis after Multilevel Fusion Surgery: More Than 2 Years Follow-Up Data.

Authors:  Do Keun Kim; Ji Yong Kim; Do Yeon Kim; Seung Chul Rhim; Seung Hwan Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-03-01

9.  Impact of paravertebral muscle in thoracolumbar and lower lumbar regions on outcomes following osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Hasibullah Habibi; Shinji Takahashi; Masatoshi Hoshino; Kazushi Takayama; Ryuichi Sasaoka; Tadao Tsujio; Hiroyuki Yasuda; Fumiaki Kanematsu; Hiroshi Kono; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Shoichiro Ohyama; Yusuke Hori; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Sagittal spinal and pelvic postures of highly-trained young canoeists.

Authors:  Pedro A López-Miñarro; José M Muyor; Fernando Alacid
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.