Literature DB >> 11145808

2000 Volvo Award winner in biomechanical studies: Monitoring in vivo implant loads with a telemeterized internal spinal fixation device.

A Rohlmann1, F Graichen, U Weber, G Bergmann.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Implant loads were measured in 10 patients using telemeterized internal spinal fixation devices.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the postoperative temporal course of implant loads. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Little information exists regarding the temporal course of loads on internal spinal fixation devices.
METHODS: The telemeterized internal spinal fixator allows the measurement of three force components and three moments acting in the fixator. Implant loads were determined in up to 20 measuring sessions for different activities, including walking, standing, sitting, lying in the supine position, and lifting an extended leg while in the supine position.
RESULTS: Implant loads often increased shortly after anterior interbody fusion was performed. Several patients retained the same high level even after fusion had taken place. This explains the reason why screw breakage sometimes occurs more than half a year after implantation. The time of fusion could not be pinpointed from the loading curves.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that fixators may be highly loaded even after fusion has occurred. A flexion bending moment acts on the implant even with the body in a relaxed lying position. This means that already shortly after the anterior procedure, the shape of the spine is not neutral and unloaded, but slightly deformed, which loads the fixators. Pedicle screw breakage more than half a year after insertion does not prove that anterior interbody fusion has not occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11145808     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Nagananda K Burra; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Mechanical loading of the intervertebral disc: from the macroscopic to the cellular level.

Authors:  Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke; Fabio Galbusera; Harris Pratsinis; Eleni Mavrogonatou; Antje Mietsch; Dimitris Kletsas; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Dominik Kaiser; David Volkheimer; Carsten Hackenbroch; Klaus Püschel; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  How does a novel monoplanar pedicle screw perform biomechanically relative to monoaxial and polyaxial designs?

Authors:  Samuel R Schroerlucke; Nikolai Steklov; Gregory M Mundis; James F Marino; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Robert K Eastlack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Basic concepts in metal work failure after metastatic spine tumour surgery.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar; Ravish Patel; Anshuja Charvi Wadhwa; Aravind Kumar; Helena Maria Milavec; Dhiraj Sonawane; Gurpal Singh; Lorin Michael Benneker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A combined numerical and experimental technique for estimation of the forces and moments in the lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Shaobai Wang; Won Man Park; Hemanth R Gadikota; Jun Miao; Yoon Hyuk Kim; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  TGF-beta1-enhanced TCP-coated sensate scaffolds can detect bone bonding.

Authors:  J A Szivek; D S Margolis; B K Garrison; E Nelson; R K Vaidyanathan; D W DeYoung
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.