Literature DB >> 11050353

Load-bearing and stress analysis of the human spine under a novel wrapping compression loading.

A Shirazi-Adl1, M Parnianpour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine biomechanics of the human spine under a novel compression loading that follows the curvature of the spine.Design. The detailed response of the spine is predicted and compared under various types of compression loading at different postures.
BACKGROUND: The posture and loading configuration could be so adjusted as to increase load-bearing capacity and stability of the spine in compression while minimizing the muscle activity and risk of tissue injury.
METHODS: The nonlinear finite element formulation of wrapping elements sliding over solid body edges is developed and used to study the load-bearing capacity of simplified beam-rigid body thoracolumbar (T1-S1) and lumbosacral (L1-S1) spines under a wrapping compression force. The load-bearing and stress analysis of a detailed model of the lumbar spine, L1-S1, is also investigated under five wrapping loads resulting in differential compression forces at various levels. Follower load at L1, axially fixed compression at L1, and combined axially fixed compression and moments load are also considered for comparison. For the detailed model, the effect of changes in the position of wrapping elements and in the lumbar curvature on results are considered.
RESULTS: The idealized wrapping loading stiffens the spine, allowing it to carry very large compression loads without hypermobility. It diminishes local segmental shear forces and moments as well as tissue stresses.
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to fixed axial compression, the compression loading by wrapping elements that follow the spinal curvatures increases the load-bearing capacity in compression and provides a greater margin of safety against both instability and tissue injury. Relevance These findings suggest a plausible mechanism in which postural changes and muscle activation patterns could be exploited to yield a loading configuration somewhat similar to that of the wrapping loading, i.e., the net reaction force at various levels passes through discs nearly normal to their mid-height plane. To alleviate hypermobility in compression, the wrapping loading could also allow for the application of meaningful compression loads in experimental as well as model studies of the multi-segmental spinal biomechanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11050353     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00045-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  11 in total

1.  Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads--application of kinematics-based algorithm.

Authors:  A Shirazi-Adl; M El-Rich; D G Pop; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.

Authors:  Babak Bazrgari; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Navid Arjmand
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The lumbar spine has an intrinsic shape specific to each individual that remains a characteristic throughout flexion and extension.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Judith R Meakin; Kay Cooper; Rebecca J Barr; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmidt; Fabio Galbusera; Antonius Rohlmann; Thomas Zander; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of follower load on motion and stiffness of the human thoracic spine with intact rib cage.

Authors:  Hadley L Sis; Erin M Mannen; Benjamin M Wong; Eileen S Cadel; Mary L Bouxsein; Dennis E Anderson; Elizabeth A Friis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading.

Authors:  Deed E Harrison; Christopher J Colloca; Donald D Harrison; Tadeusz J Janik; Jason W Haas; Tony S Keller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine on facet joint force and intradiscal pressure--a finite element study.

Authors:  Ching-Sung Kuo; Hsuan-Teh Hu; Ruey-Mo Lin; Kuo-Yuan Huang; Po-Chun Lin; Zheng-Cheng Zhong; Mu-Lin Hseih
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Biomechanical analysis and modeling of different vertebral growth patterns in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and healthy subjects.

Authors:  Lin Shi; Defeng Wang; Mark Driscoll; Isabelle Villemure; Winnie Cw Chu; Jack Cy Cheng; Carl-Eric Aubin
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2011-05-23

9.  Semiautomated 3D Spine Reconstruction from Biplanar Radiographic Images: Prediction of Intervertebral Loading in Scoliotic Subjects.

Authors:  Tito Bassani; Claudia Ottardi; Francesco Costa; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Fabio Galbusera
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-20

10.  Development and validation of a timely and representative finite element human spine model for biomechanical simulations.

Authors:  Ibrahim El Bojairami; Khaled El-Monajjed; Mark Driscoll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.