Literature DB >> 15139633

Peripheral compression as a function of stimulus level and frequency region in normal-hearing listeners.

David A Nelson1, Anna C Schroder.   

Abstract

Fixed-probe-level temporal masking curves (TMCs) were obtained from normal-hearing listeners at probe frequencies between 250 and 8000 Hz. The short probe tones were fixed in level (approximately 10-dB SPL). The level of the preceding forward masker was adjusted to obtain masked threshold as a function of the time delay between masker and probe. These isoresponse TMCs were obtained for an on-frequency masker, where the masker frequency (Fm) and probe frequency (Fp) were the same, and for an off-frequency masker below the probe frequency (Fm = 0.6 Fp). Slopes of off-frequency TMCs for probe tones at 250-1000 Hz were steeper than those for probe tones between 2000 and 4000 Hz, supporting the notion that response growth for Fm = 0.6 Fp at lower probe frequencies is not linear. Therefore, a group average off-frequency TMC slope, for probe frequencies between 2 and 4 kHz, was used to calculate response growth at every probe frequency. Input/output response growth curves were derived from the TMCs, and response growth rates were calculated as a function of the masker level in individual ears. At any particular probe frequency, response growth rates varied with input level, from near 1.0 at low input levels, to <0.2 at mid levels, and back to near 1.0 at levels above 80-dB SPL. It was concluded that compression is equally strong at low and high frequencies as it is at mid frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15139633     DOI: 10.1121/1.1689341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson; Heather Kreft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Heather A Kreft; Elizabeth S Anderson; Gail S Donaldson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Estimates of compression at low and high frequencies using masking additivity in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson; Catherine G O'Hanlon; Vit Drga; Dhany Arifianto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On the controversy about the sharpness of human cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21

7.  Otoacoustic emission theories and behavioral estimates of human basilar membrane motion are mutually consistent.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Peter T Johannesen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-06-13

8.  Forward-masking recovery and the assumptions of the temporal masking curve method of inferring cochlear compression.

Authors:  Patricia Pérez-González; Peter T Johannesen; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Use of psychometric-function slopes for forward-masked tones to investigate cochlear nonlinearity.

Authors:  Kim S Schairer; Jessica Messersmith; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.