Literature DB >> 19062859

Use of psychometric-function slopes for forward-masked tones to investigate cochlear nonlinearity.

Kim S Schairer1, Jessica Messersmith, Walt Jesteadt.   

Abstract

Schairer et al. [(2003). "Effects of peripheral nonlinearity on psychometric functions for forward-masked tones," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 1560-1573] demonstrated that cochlear nonlinearity is reflected in psychometric-function (PF) slopes for 4 kHz forward-masked tones. The goals of the current study were to use PF slopes to compare the degree of compression between signal frequencies of 0.25 and 4 kHz in listeners with normal hearing (LNH), and between LNH and listeners with cochlear hearing loss (LHL). Forward-masked thresholds were estimated in LNH and LHL using on- and off-frequency maskers and 0.25 and 4 kHz signals in three experiments. PFs were reconstructed from adaptive-procedure data for each subject in each condition. Trends in PF slopes across conditions suggest comparable compression at 0.25 and 4 kHz, and potentially a wider bandwidth of compression in relative frequency at 0.25 kHz. This is consistent with other recent behavioral studies that revise earlier estimates of less compression at lower frequencies. The preliminary results in LHL demonstrate that PF slopes are abnormally steep at frequencies with HL, but are similar to those for LNH at frequencies with NH. Overall, the results are consistent with the notion that PF slopes reflect degree of cochlear nonlinearity and can be used as an additional measure of compression across frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062859      PMCID: PMC2600619          DOI: 10.1121/1.2968686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  35 in total

1.  Temporal mechanisms underlying recovery from forward masking in multielectrode-implant listeners.

Authors:  M Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A computer model of the auditory-nerve response to forward-masking stimuli.

Authors:  Ray Meddis; Lowel P O'Mard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing.

Authors:  M L Hicks; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; A Recio; S S Narayan; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; C J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of pure-tone audibility thresholds obtained with audiological and two-interval forced-choice procedures.

Authors:  L Marshall; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-03

7.  Auditory time constants for off-frequency forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson; R Pavlov
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-06

8.  Peripheral compression as a function of stimulus level and frequency region in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Anna C Schroder
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson; R L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Temporal masking curves for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Thomas H Stainsby; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  3 in total

1.  The influence of hearing-aid compression on forward-masked thresholds for adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.