Literature DB >> 15134479

Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance.

Jason D Marsack1, Larry N Thibos, Raymond A Applegate.   

Abstract

Wavefront-guided refractive surgery and custom optical corrections have reduced the residual root mean squared (RMS) wavefront error in the eye to relatively low levels (typically on the order of 0.25 microm or less over a 6-mm pupil, a dioptric equivalent of 0.19 D). It has been shown that experimental variation of the distribution of 0.25 microm of wavefront error across the pupil can cause variation in visual acuity of two lines on a standard logMAR acuity chart. This result demonstrates the need for single-value metrics other than RMS wavefront error to quantify the effects of low levels of aberration on acuity. In this work, we present the correlation of 31 single-value metrics of optical quality to high-contrast visual acuity for 34 conditions where the RMS wavefront error was equal to 0.25 microm over a 6-mm pupil. The best metric, called the visual Strehl ratio, accounts for 81% of the variance in high-contrast logMAR acuity.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15134479     DOI: 10.1167/4.4.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  59 in total

1.  Analysis of the optical quality by determining the modulation transfer function for anterior corneal surface in myopes.

Authors:  Yan-Zhen Zheng; Yan-Peng Chen; Yan Qiu; Guo-Guang Zhai; Yao-Yu Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  [Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order--Part I: Basic principles].

Authors:  J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Comparison of contrast sensitivity, depth of field and ocular wavefront aberrations in eyes with an IOL with zero versus positive spherical aberration.

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Mujtaba A Qazi; Keith H Edwards; Jeff P Sanderson; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Change in visual acuity is well correlated with change in image-quality metrics for both normal and keratoconic wavefront errors.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Harold E Bedell; Yue Shi; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity.

Authors:  Douglas D Koch; Li Wang
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

9.  Comparison of spherical aberration and small-pupil profiles in improving depth of focus for presbyopic corrections.

Authors:  Adam Hickenbotham; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.