Literature DB >> 18427592

Custom optimization of intraocular lens asphericity.

Douglas D Koch1, Li Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the optimal amount of ocular spherical aberration (SA) in an intraocular lens (IOL) to maximize optical quality.
METHODS: In 154 eyes of 94 patients aged 40 to 80 years, implantation of aspheric IOLs was simulated with different amounts of SA to produce residual ocular SA from -0.30 microm to +0.30 microm. Using the VOL-CT program (Sarver & Associates, Carbondale, Illinois), corneal wavefront aberrations up to 6th order were computed from corneal topographic elevation data (Humphrey Atlas, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, California). Using the ZernikeTool program (Advanced Medical Optics, Inc, Santa Ana, California), the polychromatic point spread function with Stiles-Crawford effect was calculated for the residual ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs, 3rd to 6th order, 6-mm pupil), assuming fully corrected 2nd-order aberrations. Five parameters were used to quantify optical image quality, and we determined the residual ocular SA at which the maximal image quality was achieved for each eye. Stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to assess the predictors for optimal SA of each eye.
RESULTS: The optimal SA varied widely among eyes. Most eyes had best image quality with low amounts of negative SA. For modulation transfer function volume up to 15 cycles/degree, the amount of optimal SA could be predicted based on other HOAs of the cornea with coefficient of multiple determination (R(2)) of 79%. Eight Zernike terms significantly contributed to the optimal SA in this model; the order of importance to optimal SA from most to least was: Z(6)(0), Z(6)2, Z(4)2, Z(5)3, Z(6)4, Z(3)(-1), Z(3)3, and Z(3)1. For the other 4 measures of visual quality, the coefficients of determination varied from 32% to 63%.
CONCLUSION: The amount of ocular SA producing best image quality varied widely among subjects and could be predicted based on corneal HOAs. Selection of an aspheric IOL should be customized according to the full spectrum of corneal HOAs and not 4th-order SA alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18427592      PMCID: PMC2258135     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  17 in total

1.  Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Adaptive optics simulation of intraocular lenses with modified spherical aberration.

Authors:  Patricia A Piers; Enrique J Fernandez; Silvestre Manzanera; Sverker Norrby; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Optical performance of 3 intraocular lens designs in the presence of decentration.

Authors:  Griffith E Altmann; Louis D Nichamin; Stephen S Lane; Jay S Pepose
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Effect of decentration of wavefront-corrected intraocular lenses on the higher-order aberrations of the eye.

Authors:  Li Wang; Douglas D Koch
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09

5.  Optical surface optimization for the correction of presbyopia.

Authors:  Guang-Ming Dai
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  Light-adjustable lens: customizing correction for multifocality and higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Christian A Sandstedt; Shiao H Chang; Robert H Grubbs; Daniel M Schwartz
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

7.  Visual performance of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses: intraindividual comparison of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations.

Authors:  Thomas Kasper; Jens Bühren; Thomas Kohnen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Contrast sensitivity after implantation of a spherical versus an aspherical intraocular lens in biaxial microincision cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sabine Kurz; Frank Krummenauer; Hagen Thieme; H Burkhard Dick
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study.

Authors:  Roberto Bellucci; Antonio Scialdone; Lucio Buratto; Simonetta Morselli; Chiara Chierego; Alessandra Criscuoli; Giuseppe Moretti; Patricia Piers
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality.

Authors:  Li Chen; Ben Singer; Antonio Guirao; Jason Porter; David R Williams
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Objective evaluation of refractive data and astigmatism: quantification and analysis.

Authors:  S B Kaye
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Changes in spherical aberration after various corneal surface ablation techniques.

Authors:  Hyun Seok Ahn; Jae Lim Chung; Eung Kweon Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-28

3.  Correlation between contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberration based on pupil diameter after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Takefumi Yamaguchi; Kazuno Negishi; Kazuhiko Ohnuma; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-07

4.  Assessment of dysphotopsia in pseudophakic subjects with multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Phillip J Buckhurst; Shehzad A Naroo; Leon N Davies; Sunil Shah; Tom Drew; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-19

Review 5.  The evidence informing the surgeon's selection of intraocular lens on the basis of light transmittance properties.

Authors:  X Li; D Kelly; J M Nolan; J L Dennison; S Beatty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Daniel Pascual; Susana Marcos; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.