Literature DB >> 1512322

Using acoustic distortion products to measure the cochlear amplifier gain on the basilar membrane.

J B Allen1, P F Fahey.   

Abstract

Most models of the cochlea developed during the last decade have explained frequency selectivity and sensitivity of the cochlea at threshold by the use of power amplification of the acoustic wave on the basilar membrane. This power amplification has been referred to as the cochlear amplifier (CA). In this paper, a method to measure the cochlear amplifier gain as a function of position along the basilar membrane is derived from a simple model. Next, experimental evidence is presented that strongly restricts the properties of these proposed cochlear amplifier models. Specifically, it is shown that small signals generated by mechanical nonlinearities in the basilar membrane motion are not amplified during basilar membrane propagation, contrary to what would be expected from the cochlear amplifier hypotheses. This paper describes a method of measuring the cochlear power gain as a function of frequency and position, from the stapes to within 2 mm of the place corresponding to the frequency being measured. Experimental results in the cat indicate that the total gain of the cochlear amplifier, over the range of positions measured, must be less than 10 dB. The simplest interpretation of the experimental results is that there is no cochlear amplifier. The results suggest that the cochlea must achieve its frequency selectivity by some other means.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1512322     DOI: 10.1121/1.404281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Inverted direction of wave propagation (IDWP) in the cochlea.

Authors:  Egbert de Boer; Jiefu Zheng; Edward Porsov; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  A mechanism for active hearing.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Peter G Gillespie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Modeling the dependence of the distortion product otoacoustic emission response on primary frequency ratio.

Authors:  Renata Sisto; Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Sumitrajit Dhar; Arturo Moleti
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-26

4.  Two-Dimensional Cochlear Micromechanics Measured In Vivo Demonstrate Radial Tuning within the Mouse Organ of Corti.

Authors:  Hee Yoon Lee; Patrick D Raphael; Anping Xia; Jinkyung Kim; Nicolas Grillet; Brian E Applegate; Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Measurement of cochlear power gain in the sensitive gerbil ear.

Authors:  Tianying Ren; Wenxuan He; Peter G Gillespie
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Energy Flux in the Cochlea: Evidence Against Power Amplification of the Traveling Wave.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Corstiaen P C Versteegh
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 9.  Making an effort to listen: mechanical amplification in the ear.

Authors:  A J Hudspeth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Cochlear Outer-Hair-Cell Power Generation and Viscous Fluid Loss.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Charles R Steele; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.