Literature DB >> 1512321

Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. I: Middle-ear input impedance.

M E Ravicz1, J J Rosowski, H F Voigt.   

Abstract

This is the first paper of a series dealing with sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the gerbil. The purpose of the series is to quantify the physiological action of the gerbil's relatively large tympanic membrane and middle-ear air cavities. To this end the middle-ear input impedance ZT was measured at frequencies between 10 Hz and 18 kHz before and after manipulations of the middle-ear cavity. The frequency dependence of ZT is consistent with that of the middle-ear transfer function computed from extant data. Comparison of the impedance and transfer function suggests a middle-ear transformer ratio of 50 at frequencies below 1 kHz, substantially smaller than the anatomical value of 90 [Lay, J. Morph. 138, 41-120 (1972)]. Below 1 kHz the data suggest a low-frequency acoustic stiffness KT for the middle ear of 970 Pa/mm3 and a stiffness of the middle-ear cavity of 720 Pa/mm3 (middle-ear volume V MEC of 195 mm3); thus the middle-ear air spaces contribute about 70% of the acoustic stiffness of the auditory periphery. Manipulations of a middle-ear model suggest that decreases in V MEC lead to proportionate increases in KT but that further increases in middle-ear cavity volume produce only limited decreases in middle-ear stiffness. The data and the model point out that the real part of the middle-ear impedance at frequencies below 100 Hz is determined primarily by losses within the middle-ear cavity. The measured impedance is comparable in magnitude and frequency dependence to the impedance in several larger mammalian species commonly used in auditory research. A comparison of low-frequency stiffness and anatomical dimensions among several species suggests that the large middle-ear cavities in gerbil act to reduce the middle-ear stiffness at low frequencies. A description of sound-power collection by the gerbil ear requires a description of the function of the external ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1512321     DOI: 10.1121/1.404280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Reverse transmission along the ossicular chain in gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Willem F Decraemer; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-31

2.  A study of sound transmission in an abstract middle ear using physical and finite element models.

Authors:  Antonio Gonzalez-Herrera; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The path of a click stimulus from ear canal to umbo.

Authors:  Mario Milazzo; Elika Fallah; Michael Carapezza; Nina S Kumar; Jason H Lei; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Jocelyn E Songer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The effect of superior-canal opening on middle-ear input admittance and air-conducted stapes velocity in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.