Literature DB >> 18183376

Simultaneity learning in vision, audition, tactile sense and their cross-modal combinations.

Veijo Virsu1, Henna Oksanen-Hennah, Anita Vedenpää, Pentti Jaatinen, Pekka Lahti-Nuuttila.   

Abstract

Latencies of sensory neurons vary depending on stimulus variables such as intensity, contrast, distance and adaptation. Therefore, different parts of an object and simultaneous environmental events could often elicit non-simultaneous neural representations. However, despite the neural discrepancies of timing, our actions and object perceptions are usually veridical. Recent results suggest that this temporal veridicality is assisted by the so-called simultaneity constancy which actively compensates for neural timing asynchronies. We studied whether a corresponding compensation by simultaneity constancy could be learned in natural interaction with the environment without explicit feedback. Brief stimuli, whose objective simultaneity/non-simultaneity was judged, consisted of flashes, clicks or touches, and their cross-modal combinations. The stimuli were presented as two concurrent trains. Twenty-eight adult participants practised unimodal (visual, auditory and tactile) and cross-modal (audiovisual, audiotactile and visuotactile) simultaneity judgement tasks in eight sessions, two sessions per week. Effects of practice were tested 7 months later. All tasks indicated improved judgements of simultaneity that were also long-lasting. This simultaneity learning did not affect relative temporal resolution (Weber fraction). Transfer of learning between practised tasks was minimal, which suggests that simultaneity learning mechanisms are not centralised but modally specific. Our results suggest that natural perceptual learning can generate simultaneity-constancy-like phenomena in a well-differentiated and long-lasting manner and concomitantly in several sensory systems. Hebbian learning can explain how experience with environmental simultaneity and non-simultaneity can develop the veridicality of perceived synchrony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18183376     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1254-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

1.  Perceived timing of first- and second-order changes in vision and hearing.

Authors:  Roberto Arrighi; David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Multisensory integration: strategies for synchronization.

Authors:  Andrew J King
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Changes in the distributed temporal response properties of SI cortical neurons reflect improvements in performance on a temporally based tactile discrimination task.

Authors:  G H Recanzone; M M Merzenich; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Changes in reaction time and search time with background luminance in the mesopic range.

Authors:  H C Walkey; J A Harlow; J L Barbur
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates.

Authors:  David Burr; Arianna Tozzi; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Practice-related improvements in somatosensory interval discrimination are temporally specific but generalize across skin location, hemisphere, and modality.

Authors:  S S Nagarajan; D T Blake; B A Wright; N Byl; M M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Timing of finger opening and ball release in fast and accurate overarm throws.

Authors:  J Hore; S Watts; J Martin; B Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A labeled-line code for small and large numerosities in the monkey prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Andreas Nieder; Katharina Merten
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  9 in total

1.  Sources of variability in interceptive movements.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  A review of the generalization of auditory learning.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Yuxuan Zhang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

4.  Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.

Authors:  Kaisa Tiippana; Viljami R Salmela
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multisensory perceptual learning of temporal order: audiovisual learning transfers to vision but not audition.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Using Spatial Manipulation to Examine Interactions between Visual and Auditory Encoding of Pitch and Time.

Authors:  Neil M McLachlan; Loretta J Greco; Emily C Toner; Sarah J Wilson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-12-27

7.  Generalization of multisensory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Albert R Powers Iii; Andrea Hillock-Dunn; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Depth cues and perceived audiovisual synchrony of biological motion.

Authors:  Carlos César Silva; Catarina Mendonça; Sandra Mouta; Rosa Silva; José Creissac Campos; Jorge Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Causal Inference for Cross-Modal Action Selection: A Computational Study in a Decision Making Framework.

Authors:  Mehdi Daemi; Laurence R Harris; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.380

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.