Literature DB >> 12590840

Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias.

W D Hairston1, M T Wallace, J W Vaughan, B E Stein, J L Norris, J A Schirillo.   

Abstract

The ability of a visual signal to influence the localization of an auditory target (i.e., "cross-modal bias") was examined as a function of the spatial disparity between the two stimuli and their absolute locations in space. Three experimental issues were examined: (a) the effect of a spatially disparate visual stimulus on auditory localization judgments; (b) how the ability to localize visual, auditory, and spatially aligned multisensory (visual-auditory) targets is related to cross-modal bias, and (c) the relationship between the magnitude of cross-modal bias and the perception that the two stimuli are spatially "unified" (i.e., originate from the same location). Whereas variability in localization of auditory targets was large and fairly uniform for all tested locations, variability in localizing visual or spatially aligned multisensory targets was much smaller, and increased with increasing distance from the midline. This trend proved to be strongly correlated with biasing effectiveness, for although visual-auditory bias was unexpectedly large in all conditions tested, it decreased progressively (as localization variability increased) with increasing distance from the midline. Thus, central visual stimuli had a substantially greater biasing effect on auditory target localization than did more peripheral visual stimuli. It was also apparent that cross-modal bias decreased as the degree of visual-auditory disparity increased. Consequently, the greatest visual-auditory biases were obtained with small disparities at central locations. In all cases, the magnitude of these biases covaried with judgments of spatial unity. The results suggest that functional properties of the visual system play the predominant role in determining these visual-auditory interactions and that cross-modal biases can be substantially greater than previously noted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12590840     DOI: 10.1162/089892903321107792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  43 in total

1.  The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Kenneth C Roberts; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Multisensory enhancement of localization under conditions of induced myopia.

Authors:  W David Hairston; Paul J Laurienti; Gautam Mishra; Jonathan H Burdette; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Alterations to multisensory and unisensory integration by stimulus competition.

Authors:  Scott R Pluta; Benjamin A Rowland; Terrence R Stanford; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Kenneth C Roberts; Roy E Crist; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Auditory spatial negative priming: what is remembered of irrelevant sounds and their locations?

Authors:  Susanne Mayr; Malte Möller; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-12

8.  Multisensory oddity detection as bayesian inference.

Authors:  Timothy Hospedales; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The optimal time window of visual-auditory integration: a reaction time analysis.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11

10.  Influence of age, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on localization of auditory, visual, and bimodal targets by human subjects.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.