Literature DB >> 16328256

Collision judgment of objects approaching the head.

E Poljac1, B Neggers, A V van den Berg.   

Abstract

Recent investigations have indicated that human perception of the trajectory of objects approaching in the horizontal plane is precise but biased away from straight ahead. This is remarkable because it could mean that subjects perceive objects that approach on a collision course as missing the head. Approach within the horizontal plane through the eyes and the fixation point (the plane of regard) is special, as general motions will also have a component of motion perpendicular to the plane of regard. Thus, we investigated three-dimensional motion perception in the vicinity of the head, including vertical components. Subjects judged whether an object that moved in the mid-sagittal plane was going to hit below or above a well-known reference point on the face like the center of the chin or the forehead (perceptual task). Tactile and proprioceptive information about the reference point significantly improved precision. Precision did not change with distance of the approaching target or with fixation direction. Bias was virtually absent for these vertical motions. When subjects pointed with their index finger to the perceived location of impact on their face (visuo-motor task), they overestimated (1.7 cm) the horizontal eccentricity of the point of impact (pointing task). Vertical bias, however, was again virtually absent. Interestingly, when trajectories intersected the plane of regard, higher precision was observed in the perceptual task regardless of the other conditions. In contrast, neither bias nor precision of the pointing task changed significantly when the trajectories intersected the plane of regard. When asked to point to the location where a trajectory intersected the plane of regard, subjects overestimated the depth component of this intersection location by about 3 cm. The absence of perceptual and pointing bias in the vertical direction in contrast to the clear horizontal bias suggests that different (combinations of) cues are used to judge these components of the trajectory of an approaching object. The results of our perceptual task suggest a role for somatosensory signals in the visual judgment of impending impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328256     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0257-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of the ventral intraparietal area.

Authors:  Dylan F Cooke; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore; Michael S A Graziano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Christopher A Buneo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Cyclopean discrimination thresholds for the direction and speed of motion in depth.

Authors:  C V Portfors-Yeomans; D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Extraretinal eye position signals determine perceived target location when they conflict with visual cues.

Authors:  R M Rine; A A Skavenski
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field.

Authors:  D Regan; A Vincent
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth.

Authors:  D Regan; S Kaushal
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  M Cynader; D Regan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  A stereotactic method for image-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation validated with fMRI and motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  S F W Neggers; T R Langerak; D J L G Schutter; R C W Mandl; N F Ramsey; P J J Lemmens; A Postma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  A pair of motion-sensitive neurons in the locust encode approaches of a looming object.

Authors:  John R Gray; Eric Blincow; R Meldrum Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Localization of the plane of regard in space.

Authors:  Ervin Poljac; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bayesian motion estimation accounts for a surprising bias in 3D vision.

Authors:  Andrew E Welchman; Judith M Lam; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Complex object motion represented by context-dependent correlated activity of visual interneurones.

Authors:  Paul C Dick; Nicole L Michel; John R Gray
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-07

5.  Spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face.

Authors:  Ruey-Song Huang; Ching-Fu Chen; Martin I Sereno
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 5.038

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.