Literature DB >> 16034565

Cognitive control can modulate intersensory facilitation: speeding up visual antisaccades with an auditory distractor.

Holle Kirchner1, Hans Colonius.   

Abstract

Although saccadic reaction times to a visual stimulus are facilitated if an auditory accompanying stimulus is presented at the same location, this intersensory facilitation effect (IFE) has not been explored for antisaccades (saccades directed opposite to a visual target). In this study participants were asked to make an antisaccade opposite to a point of light presented right or left of fixation while accompanied by an auditory stimulus either at the same or at the opposite location with different stimulus onset asynchronies. Antisaccade reaction times for unimodal auditory and bimodal stimuli were shorter than for unimodal visual stimulation, in line with prosaccade studies. The auditory accompanying stimulus afforded antisaccade reaction times approximately as fast as prosaccades in the direction of a visual target, especially when it was presented 40 ms before the spatially congruent visual target. Moreover, predictiveness of the target position facilitated performance only when the auditory stimulus was presented at the opposite location and 40 ms before the visual target (interstimulus contingency effect). We conclude that intersensory facilitation is a mandatory, bottom-up process, but in the particular case of a response conflict due to a visual target, IFE can be shown to be modulated by the predictability of the target location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16034565     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2383-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

1.  Predictiveness of a visual distractor modulates saccadic responses to auditory targets.

Authors:  Holle Kirchner; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm.

Authors:  Bettina Olk; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-01-20       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Saccades operate in violation of Hick's law.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; Leanne Boucher; Howard C Hughes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous components in the antisaccade task.

Authors:  Cristina Massen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-04

5.  Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Crystal Au; Irene T Armstrong; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Integration of competing saccade programs.

Authors:  Amelia R Hunt; Bettina Olk; Adrian von Mühlenen; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

7.  Auditory-visual interaction in the generation of saccades in man.

Authors:  C J Lueck; T J Crawford; C J Savage; C Kennard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The influence of auditory and visual distractors on human orienting gaze shifts.

Authors:  B D Corneil; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Myriam W G Vandenbroucke; Jon Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Unifying multisensory signals across time and space.

Authors:  M T Wallace; G E Roberson; W D Hairston; B E Stein; J W Vaughan; J A Schirillo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  2 in total

1.  Arousal facilitates involuntary eye movements.

Authors:  Gregory J DiGirolamo; Neha Patel; Clare L Blaukopf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Distributed representations of the "preparatory set" in the frontal oculomotor system: a TMS study.

Authors:  M Nagel; A Sprenger; R Lencer; D Kömpf; H Siebner; W Heide
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.288

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.