Literature DB >> 15096623

Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job.

Patricia L M Lee1, Graeme C Hays.   

Abstract

The female perspective on reproductive strategies remains one of the most active areas of debate in biology. Even though a single mating is often sufficient to satisfy the fertilization needs of most females and the act of further mating incurs costs, multiple paternity within broods or clutches is a common observation in nature. Direct or indirect advantage to females is the most popular explanation. However, the ubiquity of this explanation is being challenged by an increasing number of cases for which benefits are not evident. For the first time, we test possible fitness correlates of multiple paternity in a marine turtle, an organism that has long attracted attention in this area of research. Contrary to the wide-spread assumption that multiple mating by female marine turtles confers fitness benefits, none were apparent. In this study, the environment played a far stronger role in determining the success of clutches than whether paternity had been single or multiple. A more likely explanation for observations of multiply sired clutches in marine turtles is that these are successful outcomes of male coercion, where females have conceded to superfluous matings as a compromise. Thus, multiple matings by female marine turtles may be a form of damage control as females attempt to make the best of a bad job in response to male harassment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15096623      PMCID: PMC404079          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0307982101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies.

Authors:  J P Evans; A E Magurran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Uncoupling direct and indirect components of female choice in the wild.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Does multiple paternity improve fitness of the frog Crinia georgiana?

Authors:  P G Byrne; J D Roberts
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders.

Authors:  P J Watson; G Arnqvist; R R Stallmann
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Single paternity of clutches and sperm storage in the promiscuous green turtle (Chelonia mydas).

Authors:  N N Fitzsimmons
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Multiple paternity in loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) nests on Melbourne Beach, Florida: a microsatellite analysis.

Authors:  M K Moore; R M Ball
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness.

Authors:  M S Blouin; M Parsons; V Lacaille; S Lotz
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears.

Authors:  D Paetkau; W Calvert; I Stirling; C Strobeck
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Multiple paternity in the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta).

Authors:  J L Harry; D A Briscoe
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.

Authors:  T C Marshall; J Slate; L E Kruuk; J M Pemberton
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Daniel J Rankin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes.

Authors:  Safi K Darden; Darren P Croft
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Multiple mating and clutch size in invertebrate brooders versus pregnant vertebrates.

Authors:  John C Avise; Andrey Tatarenkov; Jin-Xian Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sexual conflict and the evolution of asexuality at low population densities.

Authors:  Nina Gerber; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster; William R Briggs; Patricia A Dennis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 7.  Give one species the task to come up with a theory that spans them all: what good can come out of that?

Authors:  Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Morphological Variations in the Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas): A Field Study on an Eastern Mediterranean Nesting Population.

Authors:  Bektaş Sönmez
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.058

9.  Why male orangutans do not kill infants.

Authors:  Lydia H Beaudrot; Sonya M Kahlenberg; Andrew J Marshall
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Living on the edge: how philopatry maintains adaptive potential.

Authors:  Victor A Stiebens; Sonia E Merino; Christian Roder; Frédéric J J Chain; Patricia L M Lee; Christophe Eizaguirre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.