Literature DB >> 18682356

Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes.

Safi K Darden1, Darren P Croft.   

Abstract

Sexual conflict is ubiquitous across taxa. It often results in male harassment of females for mating opportunities that are costly for females, in some cases reducing reproductive success and increasing mortality. One strategy that females may employ to avoid sexual harassment is to segregate spatially from males. In fact, we do find sexual segregation in habitat use in species that have high levels of sexual conflict; however, the role of sexual harassment in driving such segregation remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate experimentally in a population of wild Trinidadian guppies Poecilia reticulata that male sexual harassment drives females into habitats that they otherwise do not prefer to occupy. In support of the social factors hypothesis for sexual segregation, which states that social factors such as harassment drive sexual segregation, this female behaviour leads to segregation of the sexes. In the presence of males, females actively select areas of high predation risk, but low male presence, and thus trade off increased predation risk against reduced sexual harassment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18682356      PMCID: PMC2610095          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

1.  Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses.

Authors:  K E Ruckstuhl; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2002-02

2.  Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job.

Authors:  Patricia L M Lee; Graeme C Hays
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Sexual conflict.

Authors:  David J Hosken; Paula Stockley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  A PDA-based system for online recording and analysis of concurrent events in complex behavioral processes.

Authors:  Jürgen Held; Tanja Manser
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

5.  Frequency-dependent survival in natural guppy populations.

Authors:  Robert Olendorf; F Helen Rodd; David Punzalan; Anne E Houde; Carla Hurt; David N Reznick; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Unexplained sexual segregation in polygamous ungulates: a defense of an ontogenetic approach.

Authors:  R Bon; R Campan
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles.

Authors:  I P Owens; D B Thompson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants?

Authors:  L Conradt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Social components of fitness in primate groups.

Authors:  Joan B Silk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Sex-biased movement in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Darren P Croft; Brett Albanese; Bethany J Arrowsmith; Marc Botham; Michael Webster; Jens Krause
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  17 in total

1.  Male sexual harassment alters female social behaviour towards other females.

Authors:  Safi K Darden; Lauren Watts
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition.

Authors:  Safi K Darden; Richard James; Indar W Ramnarine; Darren P Croft
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexual conflict and the evolution of asexuality at low population densities.

Authors:  Nina Gerber; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Social preferences based on sexual attractiveness: a female strategy to reduce male sexual attention.

Authors:  Josefine B Brask; Darren P Croft; Katharine Thompson; Torben Dabelsteen; Safi K Darden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Population structure influences sexual conflict in wild populations of water striders.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; Michael J Dlugos; Galen P Holt; David Sloan Wilson; Johnw Pepper
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.991

8.  Large-scale age-dependent skewed sex ratio in a sexually dimorphic avian scavenger.

Authors:  Sergio A Lambertucci; Martina Carrete; José Antonio Donázar; Fernando Hiraldo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Automated Operant Conditioning Devices for Fish. Do They Work?

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Maria Santacà; Ilaria Verza; Marco Dadda; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Spatial and social sexual segregation patterns in indo-pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus).

Authors:  Christine Ann Fury; Kathreen E Ruckstuhl; Peter L Harrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.