Literature DB >> 25038050

The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict.

Hanna Kokko1, Michael D Jennions1.   

Abstract

Evolutionary conflicts of interest arise whenever genetically different individuals interact and their routes to fitness maximization differ. Sexual selection favors traits that increase an individual's competitiveness to acquire mates and fertilizations. Sexual conflict occurs if an individual of sex A's relative fitness would increase if it had a "tool" that could alter what an individual of sex B does (including the parental genes transferred), at a cost to B's fitness. This definition clarifies several issues: Conflict is very common and, although it extends outside traits under sexual selection, sexual selection is a ready source of sexual conflict. Sexual conflict and sexual selection should not be presented as alternative explanations for trait evolution. Conflict is closely linked to the concept of a lag load, which is context-dependent and sex-specific. This makes it possible to ask if one sex can "win." We expect higher population fitness if females win.
Copyright © 2014 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25038050      PMCID: PMC4142970          DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol        ISSN: 1943-0264            Impact factor:   10.005


  40 in total

Review 1.  Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research.

Authors:  C Cordero; W G Eberhard
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 2.  Current hypotheses for the evolution of sex and recombination.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.654

3.  The evolution of optimal female mating rate changes the coevolutionary dynamics of female resistance and male persistence.

Authors:  Erem Kazancioğlu; Suzanne H Alonzo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Adaptations to sexual selection and sexual conflict: insights from experimental evolution and artificial selection.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Claudia Fricke; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Do female garter snakes evade males to avoid harassment or to enhance mate quality?

Authors:  Richard Shine; Michael Wall; Tracy Langkilde; Robert T Mason
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards.

Authors:  Jean-François Le Galliard; Patrick S Fitze; Régis Ferrière; Jean Clobert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Arms races between and within species.

Authors:  R Dawkins; J R Krebs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

9.  Sexually antagonistic co-evolution: a model and an empirical test.

Authors:  A Hoyle; A S Gilburn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon.

Authors:  Shawn R Garner; Romina N Bortoluzzi; Daniel D Heath; Bryan D Neff
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  18 in total

1.  Grey zones of sexual selection: why is finding a modern definition so hard?

Authors:  Suzanne H Alonzo; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The sexual cascade and the rise of pre-ejaculatory (Darwinian) sexual selection, sex roles, and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  The Drosophila seminal proteome and its role in postcopulatory sexual selection.

Authors:  Stuart Wigby; Nora C Brown; Sarah E Allen; Snigdha Misra; Jessica L Sitnik; Irem Sepil; Andrew G Clark; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.

Authors:  Pierre-André Eyer; Alexander J Blumenfeld; Edward L Vargo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Quantifying variation in female internal genitalia: no evidence for plasticity in response to sexual conflict risk in a seed beetle.

Authors:  Blake W Wyber; Liam R Dougherty; Kathryn McNamara; Andrew Mehnert; Jeremy Shaw; Joseph L Tomkins; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Using theories of sexual selection and sexual conflict to improve our understanding of plant ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Åsa Lankinen; Kristina Karlsson Green
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.276

7.  Biomechanical Diversity of Mating Structures among Harvestmen Species Is Consistent with a Spectrum of Precopulatory Strategies.

Authors:  Mercedes Burns; Jeffrey W Shultz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Parental effects alter the adaptive value of an adult behavioural trait.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kilner; Giuseppe Boncoraglio; Jonathan M Henshaw; Benjamin J M Jarrett; Ornela De Gasperin; Alfredo Attisano; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Interspecific interactions change the outcome of sexual conflict over prehatching parental investment in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides.

Authors:  Ornela De Gasperin; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Differential selection on pollen and pistil traits in relation to pollen competition in the context of a sexual conflict over timing of stigma receptivity.

Authors:  Åsa Lankinen; Maria Strandh
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.