Literature DB >> 16612890

Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems.

Hanna Kokko1, Daniel J Rankin.   

Abstract

Two very basic ideas in sexual selection are heavily influenced by numbers of potential mates: the evolution of anisogamy, leading to sex role differentiation, and the frequency dependence of reproductive success that tends to equalize primary sex ratios. However, being explicit about the numbers of potential mates is not typical to most evolutionary theory of sexual selection. Here, we argue that this may prevent us from finding the appropriate ecological equilibria that determine the evolutionary endpoints of selection. We review both theoretical and empirical advances on how population density may influence aspects of mating systems such as intrasexual competition, female choice or resistance, and parental care. Density can have strong effects on selective pressures, whether or not there is phenotypic plasticity in individual strategies with respect to density. Mating skew may either increase or decrease with density, which may be aided or counteracted by changes in female behaviour. Switchpoints between alternative mating strategies can be density dependent, and mate encounter rates may influence mate choice (including mutual mate choice), multiple mating, female resistance to male mating attempts, mate searching, mate guarding, parental care, and the probability of divorce. Considering density-dependent selection may be essential for understanding how populations can persist at all despite sexual conflict, but simple models seem to fail to predict the diversity of observed responses in nature. This highlights the importance of considering the interaction between mating systems and population dynamics, and we strongly encourage further work in this area.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612890      PMCID: PMC1569612          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  80 in total

1.  Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Clines in polygenic traits.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Sexual selection affects local extinction and turnover in bird communities.

Authors:  Paul F Doherty; Gabriele Sorci; J Andrew Royle; James E Hines; James D Nichols; Thierry Boulinier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Ken Norris
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish.

Authors:  Elisabet Forsgren; Trond Amundsen; Asa A Borg; Jens Bjelvenmark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Density-dependent sexual selection in external fertilizers: variances in male and female fertilization success along the continuum from sperm limitation to sexual conflict in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus.

Authors:  Don R Levitan
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: choosy females boost male dispersal.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; Nicolas Perrin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Conflict between parents over care.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; Tamás Székely; John M McNamara
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 9.  Sperm competition in birds.

Authors:  T R Birkhead
Journal:  Rev Reprod       Date:  1998-05

Review 10.  Is more choice always desirable? Evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment.

Authors:  John M C Hutchinson
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-02
View more
  102 in total

1.  Eunuchs as better fighters?

Authors:  Simona Kralj-Fišer; Matjaž Kuntner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-12-14

2.  Changes in reproductive life-history strategies in response to nest density in a shell-brooding cichlid, Telmatochromis vittatus.

Authors:  Kazutaka Ota; Michio Hori; Masanori Kohda
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-11-17

3.  First evidences of sexual selection by mate choice in marine zooplankton.

Authors:  Sara Ceballos; Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts.

Authors:  Simon P Lailvaux; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Monogamy without parental care? Social and genetic mating systems of avian brood parasites.

Authors:  William E Feeney; Christina Riehl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Introduction. Sexual conflict: a new paradigm?

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell; T Chapman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Crowding, sex ratio and horn evolution in a South African beetle community.

Authors:  Joanne C Pomfret; Robert J Knell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Optimal swimming strategies in mate-searching pelagic copepods.

Authors:  Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Females increase current reproductive effort when future access to males is uncertain.

Authors:  Katja U Heubel; Kai Lindström; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Population structure influences sexual conflict in wild populations of water striders.

Authors:  Omar Tonsi Eldakar; Michael J Dlugos; Galen P Holt; David Sloan Wilson; Johnw Pepper
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.