Literature DB >> 23339237

How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.

Stephen M Shuster1, William R Briggs, Patricia A Dennis.   

Abstract

Multiple mating by females is widely thought to encourage post-mating sexual selection and enhance female fitness. We show that whether polyandrous mating has these effects depends on two conditions. Condition 1 is the pattern of sperm utilization by females; specifically, whether, among females, male mating number, m (i.e. the number of times a male mates with one or more females) covaries with male offspring number, o. Polyandrous mating enhances sexual selection only when males who are successful at multiple mating also sire most or all of each of their mates' offspring, i.e. only when Cov(♂)(m,o), is positive. Condition 2 is the pattern of female reproductive life-history; specifically, whether female mating number, m, covaries with female offspring number, o. Only semelparity does not erode sexual selection, whereas iteroparity (i.e. when Cov(♀)(m,o), is positive) always increases the variance in offspring numbers among females, which always decreases the intensity of sexual selection on males. To document the covariance between mating number and offspring number for each sex, it is necessary to assign progeny to all parents, as well as identify mating and non-mating individuals. To document significant fitness gains by females through iteroparity, it is necessary to determine the relative magnitudes of male as well as female contributions to the total variance in relative fitness. We show how such data can be collected, how often they are collected, and we explain the circumstances in which selection favouring multiple mating by females can be strong or weak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339237      PMCID: PMC3576580          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  57 in total

1.  Reproductive biology. Distinguished sperm in competition.

Authors:  T Birkhead
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males.

Authors:  T Pizzari; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sperm quality in the alternative reproductive tactics of Atlantic salmon: the importance of the loaded raffle mechanism.

Authors:  T V Vladić; T Järvi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; William R Ardren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Polyandry promotes enhanced offspring survival in decorated crickets.

Authors:  Tracie M Ivy; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The frequency of multiple paternity suggests that sperm competition is common in house mice (Mus domesticus).

Authors:  M D Dean; K G Ardlie; M W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  The quantitative genetic basis of polyandry in the parasitoid wasp, Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  D M Shuker; A J Phillimore; M N Burton-Chellew; S E Hodge; S A West
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Sex determination and differentiation.

Authors:  R V Short
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Synchronous polyandry and multiple paternity in the frog Crinia georgiana (Anura: Myobatrachidae).

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Polyandry and paternity skew in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Francesca D Frentiu; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  14 in total

1.  Characterizing male-female interactions using natural genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michael Reinhart; Tara Carney; Andrew G Clark; Anthony C Fiumera
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  The polyandry revolution.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  Dean M Castillo; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Polyandry Has No Detectable Mortality Cost in Female Mammals.

Authors:  Jean-François Lemaître; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genetic evidence confirms polygamous mating system in a crustacean parasite with multiple hosts.

Authors:  Quentin Jossart; Rémi A Wattier; Chedly Kastally; Serge Aron; Bruno David; Chantal De Ridder; Thierry Rigaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating.

Authors:  Charlotta Kvarnemo; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Multivariate selection drives concordant patterns of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection in a livebearing fish.

Authors:  Alessandro Devigili; Jonathan P Evans; Andrea Di Nisio; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Mating systems, reproductive success, and sexual selection in secretive species: a case study of the western diamond-backed rattlesnake, Crotalus atrox.

Authors:  Rulon W Clark; Gordon W Schuett; Roger A Repp; Melissa Amarello; Charles F Smith; Hans-Werner Herrmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Opportunity for Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in the Ectoparasitic Pea Crab, Dissodactylus primitivus (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae).

Authors:  Robert B Prather; Stephen M Shuster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.