Literature DB >> 15085295

Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Peter Lind1, Isabel Igerc, Thomas Beyer, Peter Reinprecht, Klaus Hausegger.   

Abstract

18F-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) has been evaluated in breast cancer for the characterisation of primary tumours, lymph node staging and the follow-up of patients after surgery, chemotherapy and/or external radiotherapy. In contrast to both the low sensitivity and moderate specificity of FDG PET in the initial detection and characterisation of breast cancer and the low lesion-based sensitivity for lymph node staging, the results from use of FDG PET in re-staging breast cancer patients are very promising. A major advantage of FDG PET imaging compared with conventional imaging is that it screens the entire patient for local recurrence, lymph node metastases and distant metastases during a single whole-body examination using a single injection of activity, with a reported average sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 77%, respectively. In most studies the sensitivity of FDG PET is higher than that of a combination of conventional imaging methods. Limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer patients include the relatively low detection rate of bone metastases, especially in case of the sclerotic subtype, and the relatively high rate of false positive results. The rather low specificity of FDG PET can be improved/increased by utilising combined anatomical-molecular imaging techniques, such as a PET/CT tomograph. First results using PET/CT imaging in the follow-up of breast cancer patients demonstrate increased specificity compared with FDG PET alone. Both imaging modalities, however, offer to detect recurrent and metastatic breast cancer disease at an early stage and thus continue to demonstrate the efficacy of molecular imaging in patient management, despite the limited therapeutic options in recurrent and metastatic breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15085295     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-004-1535-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  51 in total

1.  To AC or not to AC: that is the question.

Authors:  R L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system.

Authors:  G K von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.

Authors:  C J Thompson; K Murthy; I N Weinberg; F Mako
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Tc-99m-tetrofosmin scintimammography: a prospective study in primary breast lesions.

Authors:  P Lind; H J Gallowitsch; D Kogler; E Kresnik; P Mikosch; I Gomez
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.379

6.  Comparison of pharmacokinetic MRI and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer: initial experience.

Authors:  G Brix; M Henze; M V Knopp; R Lucht; J Doll; H Junkermann; H Hawighorst; U Haberkorn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy.

Authors:  I C Smith; A E Welch; A W Hutcheon; I D Miller; S Payne; F Chilcott; S Waikar; T Whitaker; A K Ah-See; O Eremin; S D Heys; F J Gilbert; P F Sharp
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Skeletal metastases from breast cancer: imaging with nuclear medicine.

Authors:  G J Cook; I Fogelman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  18-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Muna M Baslaim; Siema M Bakheet; Razan Bakheet; Adnan Ezzat; Mahmoud El-Foudeh; Asma Tulbah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation.

Authors:  Denis Tack; Viviane De Maertelaer; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Potential Clinical Applications of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Mammography in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ihn-Ho Cho; Eun-Jung Kong
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-30

3.  PET imaging of bacterial infections with fluorine-18-labeled maltohexaose.

Authors:  Xinghai Ning; Wonewoo Seo; Seungjun Lee; Kiyoko Takemiya; Mohammad Rafi; Xuli Feng; Daiana Weiss; Xiaojian Wang; Larry Williams; Vernon M Camp; Malveaux Eugene; W Robert Taylor; Mark Goodman; Niren Murthy
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 4.  Breast image registration techniques: a survey.

Authors:  Yujun Guo; Radhika Sivaramakrishna; Cheng-Chang Lu; Jasjit S Suri; Swamy Laxminarayan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Liver resection for breast cancer metastasis: does it improve survival?

Authors:  Jean Lubrano; Horace Roman; Sophie Tarrab; Benoit Resch; Loïc Marpeau; Michel Scotté
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Dynamic 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography for Chemotherapy Response Monitoring of Breast Cancer Xenografts.

Authors:  Alexandr Kristian; Jon Erik Holtedahl; Turid Torheim; Cecilia Futsaether; Eivor Hernes; Olav Engebraaten; Gunhild M Mælandsmo; Eirik Malinen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Normal Physiologic and Benign Foci with F-18 FDG Avidity on PET/CT in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Soon-Ah Park; Kwang-Man Lee; UnJong Choi; Hun Soo Kim; Hye-Won Kim; Jeong Hoon Song
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10-16

8.  Tumor-to-tumor metastasis: an unusual case of breast cancer metastatic to a solitary fibrous tumor.

Authors:  Frank O Velez-Cubian; Robert C Gabordi; Prudence V Smith; Eric M Toloza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28

10.  Diffuse Endobronchial Wall Spread of Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tomonobu Koizumi; Nobumitsu Kobayashi; Shintarou Kanda; Masanori Yasuo; Keishi Kubo; Kenichi Itou
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2009-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.