Literature DB >> 11702142

Comparison of pharmacokinetic MRI and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer: initial experience.

G Brix1, M Henze, M V Knopp, R Lucht, J Doll, H Junkermann, H Hawighorst, U Haberkorn.   

Abstract

It was the aim of this methodology-oriented clinical pilot study to compare the potential of dynamic MRI and 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for the detection and characterization of breast cancer. Fourteen women with suspicious breast lesions were examined. The MRI data were acquired with a turbo fast low-angle shot sequence and analyzed using a pharmacokinetic model. Emission data were detected in the sensitive 3D modus, iteratively reconstructed, and superimposed onto corresponding transmission images. In the 14 patients, 13 breast masses with a suspicious contrast enhancement and FDG uptake were detected. For these lesions, no statistically significant correlation between evaluated MR and PET parameters was found. Of the 9 histologically confirmed carcinomas, 8 were correctly characterized with MRI and PET. Two inflammatory lesions were concordantly classified as cancer. Moreover, dynamic MRI yielded another false-positive finding. In 6 patients, PET detected occult lymph node and/or distant metastases. Although both functional imaging techniques provide independent tissue information, the results concerning the diagnosis of primary breast lesions were almost identical. An advantage of PET, however, is its ability to localize lymph node involvement and distant metastases as an integral part of the examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11702142     DOI: 10.1007/s003300100944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  13 in total

1.  Association between serial dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic 18F-FDG PET measures in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Risa K Vanantwerp; Robert K Doot; Xiaoyu Chai; Brenda F Kurland; Peter R Eby; Jennifer M Specht; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Constance D Lehman; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Hybrid PET-dynamic CECT in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Chandan Jyoti Das
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  An exploratory pilot study into the association between microcirculatory parameters derived by MRI-based pharmacokinetic analysis and glucose utilization estimated by PET-CT imaging in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Sotirios Bisdas; Oliver Seitz; Markus Middendorp; Nicole Chambron-Pinho; Theodosios Bisdas; Thomas J Vogl; Renate Hammerstingl; Ulrike Ernemann; Martin G Mack
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Quantitative MR characterization of disease activity in the knee in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a longitudinal pilot study.

Authors:  Dagnachew W Workie; T Brent Graham; Tal Laor; Akila Rajagopal; Kendall J O'Brien; Wendy A Bommer; Judy M Racadio; Norah J Shire; Bernard J Dardzinski
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-03-31

Review 5.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET.

Authors:  Gerhard W Goerres; Sven C A Michel; Mathias K Fehr; Achim H Kaim; Hans C Steinert; Burkhardt Seifert; Gustav K von Schulthess; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Clinical and diagnostic value of preoperative MR mammography and FDG-PET in suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  C Walter; K Scheidhauer; A Scharl; U-J Goering; P Theissen; H Kugel; T Krahe; U Pietrzyk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The relationship between vascular and metabolic characteristics of primary breast tumours.

Authors:  Scott I K Semple; Fiona J Gilbert; Thomas W Redpath; Roger T Staff; Trevor S Ahearn; Andrew E Welch; Steven D Heys; Andrew W Hutcheon; Elizabeth H Smyth; Shailesh Chaturvedi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  K Scheidhauer; C Walter; M D Seemann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Metabolic and vascular features of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging and (15)O-water positron emission tomography blood flow in breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter R Eby; Savannah C Partridge; Steven W White; Robert K Doot; Lisa K Dunnwald; Erin K Schubert; Brenda F Kurland; Constance D Lehman; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.