Literature DB >> 16686816

Black-white differences in risk perceptions of breast cancer survival and screening mammography benefit.

David A Haggstrom1, Marilyn M Schapira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given differences in cancer survival by race, black women may differ from white women in breast cancer risk perceptions.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate black-white differences in risk perceptions of breast cancer survival and screening mammography benefit.
DESIGN: A written survey was administered to a random sample of women attending general internal medicine clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Black and white women, ages 40 to 69. MEASUREMENTS: Risk perceptions were measured regarding (1) average 5-year survival after a breast cancer diagnosis and (2) relative risk reduction of screening mammography. Women's risk perceptions were defined as being accurate, as well as more or less pessimistic. Measured patient characteristics included race, age, family history of breast cancer, income, insurance, education, and numeracy. Unadjusted Pearson chi(2) tests and adjusted multivariable regression analyses were done.
RESULTS: Black women were more likely than white women to accurately perceive breast cancer survival in both unadjusted (48% vs 26%, P<.001) and adjusted analyses (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=3.58; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.56 to 8.21). Black women were also more likely to accurately perceive the benefit of screening mammography in unadjusted (39% vs 15%, P<.001) and adjusted analyses (AOR=2.70; 95% CI=1.09 to 6.69). Black women were more likely to have a more pessimistic perception of mammography benefit in unadjusted (47% vs 15%, P<.0001) and adjusted analyses (AOR=3.94; 95% CI=1.62 to 9.56).
CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of risk perceptions can help physicians to tailor patient education. Physician acknowledgment of more accurate risk perceptions among black women may serve as a basis to improve patient-physician communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16686816      PMCID: PMC1484725          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00347.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  18 in total

1.  Risk charts: putting cancer in context.

Authors:  Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Race and trust in the health care system.

Authors:  L Ebony Boulware; Lisa A Cooper; Lloyd E Ratner; Thomas A LaVeist; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  The effect of patients' preferences on racial differences in access to renal transplantation.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; S M Rubin; C Sandrock; V L Ernster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-11       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters.

Authors:  S Woloshin; L M Schwartz; W C Black; H G Welch
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Cancer statistics, 2001.

Authors:  R T Greenlee; M B Hill-Harmon; T Murray; M Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.

Authors:  C Lerman; E Lustbader; B Rimer; M Daly; S Miller; C Sands; A Balshem
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Comparative mortality risks of chronic dialysis and cadaveric transplantation in black end-stage renal disease patients.

Authors:  A O Ojo; F K Port; R A Wolfe; E A Mauger; L Williams; D P Berling
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population.

Authors:  Susan L Davids; Marilyn M Schapira; Timothy L McAuliffe; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Cancer statistics, 2003.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Alicia Samuels; Asma Ghafoor; Elizabeth Ward; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  11 in total

1.  Predictors of perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: sociodemographic factors and mass media exposures.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Andrea C Dunlavy; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-12

2.  Beliefs and attitudes about lung cancer screening among smokers.

Authors:  Sirisha Jonnalagadda; Cara Bergamo; Jenny J Lin; Linda Lurslurchachai; Michael Diefenbach; Cardinale Smith; Judith E Nelson; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Uncertain Futures: Individual Risk and Social Context in Decision-Making in Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee
Journal:  Health Risk Soc       Date:  2010-04

4.  Breast Screening Utilization and Cost Sharing Among Employed Insured Women Following the Affordable Care Act: Impact of Race and Income.

Authors:  Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; A Mark Fendrick; Sarah Bell; Neil Kamdar; Emily Kobernik; Vanessa K Dalton; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Nathan F Dieckmann
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Family Ties: The Role of Family Context in Family Health History Communication About Cancer.

Authors:  Vivian M Rodríguez; Rosalie Corona; Joann N Bodurtha; John M Quillin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-01-06

7.  Numeracy and communication with patients: they are counting on us.

Authors:  Andrea J Apter; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Janine T Remillard; Ian M Bennett; Elana Pearl Ben-Joseph; Rosanna M Batista; James Hyde; Rima E Rudd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Perspective: the role of numeracy in health care.

Authors:  Russell L Rothman; Victor M Montori; Andrea Cherrington; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-09

9.  Disparities in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy use among women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Younji Kim; Anne Marie McCarthy; Mirar Bristol; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-01-27

10.  Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Jutta Mata; Ronald Frank
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.