Literature DB >> 8515494

Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.

C Lerman1, M Daly, C Sands, A Balshem, E Lustbader, T Heggan, L Goldstein, J James, P Engstrom.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies estimate that first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer have a twofold to 10-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Recently, attention has focused on the mammography screening practices of women who are at high risk for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to characterize mammography screening practices in a sample of first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients and to identify variables that may serve as barriers to or facilitators of adherence to mammography.
METHODS: Cross-sectional (rather than prospective) data were collected by telephone interviews with 140 women aged 35-79 years who had a family history of breast cancer in at least one first-degree relative (mother, sister, or daughter). Data were recorded on mammography screening patterns, depression, stress impact, and breast cancer worries.
RESULTS: Women whose mammography history adhered to age-specific recommendations varied by age: 76% of first-degree relatives aged 35-39 years, 86% aged 40-49 years, and 63% aged 50 years or more. In bivariate analyses, level of education (P = .001), employment (P = .046), and time since diagnosis of the index patient (P = .044) were significantly and positively associated with mammography adherence. Variables associated negatively with adherence included age (P = .019), intrusive thoughts about breast cancer (P = .042), and breast cancer worries that interfered with daily functioning (P = .004). Multivariate analysis by logistic regression indicated that only breast cancer worries (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-5.9) and education (OR = 4.8; CI = 1.6-14.3) were significant independent predictors of mammography adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that most women at high risk for breast cancer adhere to the recommended mammography screening guidelines of the National Cancer Institute. However, rates of adherence among high-risk women aged 50 years and older are suboptimal; only 63% of these women received annual screening mammograms, and 13% had never been screened. Breast cancer worries may pose a barrier to mammography adherence among high-risk women, particularly those with less formal education. IMPLICATIONS: Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to validate the present findings and to evaluate the impact of psychoeducational interventions for women with affected first-degree relatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8515494     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.13.1074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  86 in total

1.  Heightened psychobiological reactivity to laboratory stressors in healthy women at familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Sandra G Zakowski; William Gerin; Jean Mamakos; Thomas Pickering; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-02

2.  Prospective association between distress and mammography utilization among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Kathryn L Taylor; Kristen S Willard
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-04

3.  Family histories of breast cancer, coping styles, and psychological adjustment.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-06

4.  The relationship of health numeracy to cancer screening.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Joan Neuner; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Mary Ann Gilligan; Elisabeth Hayes; Purushottam Laud
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Family environments of women seeking BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic mutation testing: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Lisa A Keenan; Karen T Lesniak; Charles A Guarnaccia; Becky Althaus; Gaby Ethington; Joanne L Blum
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Factors modifying the association between hormone-replacement therapy and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Beate Pesch; Yon Ko; Hiltrud Brauch; Ute Hamann; Volker Harth; Sylvia Rabstein; Christiane Pierl; Hans-Peter Fischer; Christian Baisch; Christina Justenhoven; Ulrich Ranft; Thomas Brüning
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh; Shiri Ilan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-09-30

8.  Breast cancer-specific intrusions are associated with increased cortisol responses to daily life stressors in healthy women without personal or family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lucia Dettenborn; Gary D James; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Guy H Montgomery; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-08-30

9.  First-degree relatives of persons suffering from osteoporosis: beliefs, knowledge, and health-related behavior.

Authors:  Perla Werner; David Olchovsky; Hava Erlich-Gelaki; Iris Vered
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Sociodemographic Characteristics, Distance to the Clinic, and Breast Cancer Screening Results.

Authors:  Seijeoung Kim; Beverly Chukwudozie; Elizabeth Calhoun
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.