Literature DB >> 8558184

Graphs to estimate an individualized risk of breast cancer.

J Benichou1, M H Gail, J J Mulvihill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinicians who counsel women about their risk for developing breast cancer need a rapid method to estimate individualized risk (absolute risk), as well as the confidence limits around that point. The Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP) model (sometimes called the Gail model) assumes no genetic model and simultaneously incorporates five risk factors, but involves cumbersome calculations and interpolations. This report provides graphs to estimate the absolute risk of breast cancer from the BCDDP model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The BCDDP recruited 280,000 women from 1973 to 1980 who were monitored for 5 years. From this cohort, 2,852 white women developed breast cancer and 3,146 controls were selected, all with complete risk-factor information. The BCDDP model, previously developed from these data, was used to prepare graphs that relate a specific summary relative-risk estimate to the absolute risk of developing breast cancer over intervals of 10, 20, and 30 years.
RESULTS: Once a summary relative risk is calculated, the appropriate graph is chosen that shows the 10-, 20-, or 30-year absolute risk of developing breast cancer. A separate graph gives the 95% confidence limits around the point estimate of absolute risk. Once a clinician rules out a single gene trait that predisposes to breast cancer and elicits information on age and four risk factors, the tables and figures permit an estimation of a women's absolute risk of developing breast cancer in the next three decades.
CONCLUSION: These results are intended to be applied to women who undergo regular screening. They should be used only in a formal counseling program to maximize a woman's understanding of the estimates and the proper use of them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8558184     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.1.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

Review 1.  Risk assessment and management of high risk familial breast cancer.

Authors:  D G R Evans; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Risk-adjusted cancer-incidence rates (United States).

Authors:  R M Merrill; E J Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Cancer Risk Assessment and Genetic Counseling in an Academic Medical Center: Consultands' Satisfaction, Knowledge, and Behavior in the First Year.

Authors:  M Penles Stadler; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rupen Shah; Kelly Rosso; S David Nathanson
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

Review 5.  Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Angela Trepanier; Mary Ahrens; Wendy McKinnon; June Peters; Jill Stopfer; Sherry Campbell Grumet; Susan Manley; Julie O Culver; Ronald Acton; Joy Larsen-Haidle; Lori Ann Correia; Robin Bennett; Barbara Pettersen; Terri Diamond Ferlita; Josephine Wagner Costalas; Katherine Hunt; Susan Donlon; Cecile Skrzynia; Carolyn Farrell; Faith Callif-Daley; Catherine Walsh Vockley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Chemoprevention of breast cancer: implications for postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Carol J Fabian; Bruce F Kimler
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Informed consent for mammography screening: modelling the risks and benefits for American women.

Authors:  Tom Marshall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Risk models used to counsel women for breast and ovarian cancer: a guide for clinicians.

Authors:  E B Claus
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Referral for cancer genetics consultation: a review and compilation of risk assessment criteria.

Authors:  H Hampel; K Sweet; J A Westman; K Offit; C Eng
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population.

Authors:  Susan L Davids; Marilyn M Schapira; Timothy L McAuliffe; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.