Literature DB >> 11008917

Relationships among breast cancer perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, and worries.

I M Lipkus1, M Kuchibhatla, C M McBride, H B Bosworth, K I Pollak, I C Siegler, B K Rimer.   

Abstract

When trying to predict breast cancer screening, it may be important to understand the relationships between perceived breast cancer risks and worries about getting breast cancer. This study examines the extent to which women's worries about breast cancer correlate with perceptions of both absolute (assessment of own) and comparative (self versus other) 10-year and lifetime risks. As part of a larger randomized intervention trial concerning hormone replacement therapy, 581 women participated in a telephone baseline survey to assess their perceptions of breast cancer risks and worries. Worries about getting breast cancer in the next 10 years and in one's lifetime were related positively to both absolute and comparative 10-year and lifetime risks. The magnitude of these relationships did not differ by time frame. Worry about breast cancer is a function of both how a woman views her own risk and how she compares her risk with that of other women. Some practitioners may encourage women to get screened for breast cancer by using emotional appeals, such as heightening women's worries about breast cancer by using risk information. Our data suggest that they should give careful consideration how best to combine, if at all, information about absolute and comparative risks. For example, if the motivation to screen is based on a sequential assessment of risk beginning with comparative and then absolute risk, creating communications that heighten perceived risk on both of these risk dimensions may be needed to evoke sufficient worry to initiate breast cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11008917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  63 in total

Review 1.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

2.  Risk perceptions and family history of lung cancer: differences by smoking status.

Authors:  L S Chen; K A Kaphingst
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Breast cancer-specific intrusions are associated with increased cortisol responses to daily life stressors in healthy women without personal or family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lucia Dettenborn; Gary D James; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Guy H Montgomery; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-08-30

4.  Perceived risk for cancer in an urban sexual minority.

Authors:  Jack E Burkhalter; Jennifer L Hay; Elliot Coups; Barbara Warren; Yuelin Li; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-09-25

5.  A model of disease-specific worry in heritable disease: the influence of family history, perceived risk and worry about other illnesses.

Authors:  Terry A DiLorenzo; Julie Schnur; Guy H Montgomery; Joel Erblich; Gary Winkel; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-02-10

6.  Predictors of perceived susceptibility of breast cancer and changes over time: a mixed modeling approach.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Paul R Swank; Lori A Bastian; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behaviors among Appalachian residents.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Adana A Llanos; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.462

8.  Chemoprevention Uptake among Women with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Meghna S Trivedi; Austin M Coe; Alejandro Vanegas; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-06-13

9.  Health beliefs associated with readiness for genetic counseling among high risk breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Kelli Nam; Courtney L Scherr; Jongphil Kim; Ram Thapa; Cathy D Meade; M Catherine Lee; Tuya Pal; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Rachel Nusbaum; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Gillian W Hooker; Beth N Peshkin; Morgan Butrick; William Tuong; Jeena Mathew; David Goerlitz; Mary B Fishman; Peter G Shields; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.