Literature DB >> 17328367

When parameters collide: a warning about categorization models.

J David Smith1.   

Abstract

Similarity-choice (S-C) models of categorization contain two principal mathematical transformations: an exponential-decay similarity function and a choice rule. However, there is a tension between the psychological processes that models emulate and the mathematics they use to do so. To illustrate this, I show that in these models an unappreciated interaction occurs between the mathematical transformations so that the stages of the model essentially cancel each other out. The result is that the model's output reflects its input linearly. This cancellation phenomenon has potentially serious implications regarding the interpretation and use of S-C models. The phenomenon also raises questions about the simplification and psychological grounding of categorization models. Modelers broadly might benefit from an internal analysis of their models, such as that described here.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17328367     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

Review 1.  Thirty categorization results in search of a model.

Authors:  J D Smith; J P Minda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Exemplar theory's predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed.

Authors:  J David Smith
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

3.  Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; John Paul Minda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Dynamical trajectories in category learning.

Authors:  Shawn W Ell; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-11

5.  Perceived distance and the classification of distorted patterns.

Authors:  M I Posner; R Goldsmith; K E Welton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-01

6.  Selective attention and the formation of linear decision boundaries: comment on McKinley and Nosofsky (1996).

Authors:  W T Maddox; F G Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI.

Authors:  P J Reber; C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.

Authors:  S Roberts; H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Similarity, distance, and categorization: a discussion of Smith's (2006) warning about "colliding parameters".

Authors:  Daniel J Navarro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

Review 2.  Animal metacognition: a tale of two comparative psychologies.

Authors:  J David Smith; Justin J Couchman; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.231

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.