Literature DB >> 15034697

Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT.

U Dorenbeck1, A G Schreyer, J Schlaier, P Held, S Feuerbach, J Seitz.   

Abstract

Assessing degenerative disease in the cervical spine remains a challenge. There is much controversy about imaging the cervical spine using MRI. Our aim in this prospective study was to compare a T2*-weighted 2D spoiled gradient-echo multiecho sequence (MEDIC) with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse with cervical myelography and postmyelographic CT. Using an assessment scale we looked at the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, neural foramina, anterior and posterior nerve roots, grey matter, ligamentaflava, oedema in the spinal cord and stenosis of the spinal canal. We also evaluated postmyelography CT and the MEDIC sequence for assessing narrowing of the neural foramina in a cadaver cervical spine. We examined 67 disc levels in 18 patients, showing 18 disc prolapses and 21 osteophytes narrowing the spinal canal or the neural foramina. All MRI studies showed these abnormalities findings equally well. Postmyelography CT was significantly better for showing the bony structures and the anterior and posterior nerve roots. The MEDIC sequence provided excellent demonstration of soft-tissue structures such as the intervertebral disc and ligamentum flavum. No statistical differences between the imaging modalities were found in the assessment of narrowing of the neural foramina or the extent of spinal stenosis. The cadaver measurements showed no overestimation of abnormalities using the MEDIC sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15034697     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-004-1175-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of two-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and two-dimensional turbo gradient spin echo sequences in MRI of the cervical spinal cord anatomy.

Authors:  P Held; J Seitz; R Fründ; W Nitz; M Lenhart; A Geissler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Quantitation of structural distortion of the cervical neural foramina in gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  R D Tien; R B Buxton; B W Schwaighofer; P K Chu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Degenerative narrowing of the cervical spine neural foramina: evaluation with high-resolution 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  D M Yousem; S W Atlas; H I Goldberg; R I Grossman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Fast spin echo vs conventional spin echo in cervical spine imaging.

Authors:  A R Gillams; J A Soto; A P Carter
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Magnetic susceptibility artifacts in gradient-recalled echo MR imaging.

Authors:  L F Czervionke; D L Daniels; F W Wehrli; L P Mark; L E Hendrix; J A Strandt; A L Williams; V M Haughton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography.

Authors:  J Reul; B Gievers; J Weis; A Thron
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  MRI of the abnormal cervical spinal cord using 2D spoiled gradient echo multiecho sequence (MEDIC) with magnetization transfer saturation pulse. A T2* weighted feasibility study.

Authors:  P Held; U Dorenbeck; J Seitz; R Fründ; H Albrich
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.447

8.  Magnetization transfer: theory and clinical applications in neuroradiology.

Authors:  R I Grossman; J M Gomori; K N Ramer; F J Lexa; M D Schnall
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  J S Tsuruda; K Remley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Cervical spondylosis: three-dimensional gradient-echo MR with magnetization transfer.

Authors:  E R Melhem; M L Benson; N J Beauchamp; R R Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  10 in total

1.  MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; C A Rowland Hill; A S Rigby; S Chandrasekaran; H Narayanamurthy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Comparison of wideband steady-state free precession and T₂-weighted fast spin echo in spine disorder assessment at 1.5 and 3 T.

Authors:  Giovanna S Danagoulian; Lei Qin; Krishna S Nayak; Rivka R Colen; Srinivasan Mukundan; Mitchell B Harris; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; William A Copen; Ehud J Schmidt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences.

Authors:  T Meindl; S Wirth; S Weckbach; O Dietrich; M Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The functional relevance of diffusion tensor imaging in comparison to conventional MRI in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  Young-Mi Yang; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Je Hyun Yoo; Yoon Hae Kwak; Jae-Keun Oh; Ji-Sun Song; Seok Woo Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Comparison of noncontrast computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of Great Danes with cervical spondylomyelopathy.

Authors:  Paula Martin-Vaquero; Ronaldo C da Costa; Wm Tod Drost
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.363

6.  Correlation of Foraminal Area and Response to Cervical Nerve Root Injections.

Authors:  Wilson Z Ray; Syed Akbari; Lubdha M Shah; Erica Bisson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-07-20

7.  Usefulness of multiecho fast field echo MRI in the evaluation of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and dural ossification of the cervical spine.

Authors:  So-Yeon Lee; Yu Ri Shin; Hee Jin Park; Myung Ho Rho; Eun Chul Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Axial Traction of the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint on Articular Cartilage Visibility: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Akira Ikumi; Sho Kohyama; Shun Okuwaki; Masaki Tatsumura; Yuki Hara; Takeo Mammoto; Takeshi Ogawa; Yuichi Yoshii; Haruo Kawamura; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-21

9.  Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Three-Dimensional Sequence for Lumbar Nerve Root with Intervertebral Foramen.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takashima; Tsuneo Takebayashi; Hiroki Shishido; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Rui Imamura; Yoshihiro Akatsuka; Yoshinori Terashima; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Masateru Nagae; Toshikazu Kubo; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16

10.  Diagnostic performance of 3D-multi-Echo-data-image-combination (MEDIC) for evaluating SLAP lesions of the shoulder.

Authors:  Felix Wuennemann; Laurent Kintzelé; Felix Zeifang; Michael W Maier; Iris Burkholder; Marc-André Weber; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christoph Rehnitz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.