Literature DB >> 22215879

MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

R J V Bartlett1, C A Rowland Hill, A S Rigby, S Chandrasekaran, H Narayanamurthy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Standard MRI of the cervical spine is performed in a different anatomical position to that utilised for traditional contrast myelography. Those well practised in myelography are familiar with the considerable changes in configuration of the bony and soft tissues of the cervical spine that may occur with changes in the degree of neck flexion and extension. We set out to compare the findings in a select group of patients with myeloradiculopathy who had undergone myelography and MRI in both standard and neck-extended positions. These findings were correlated with the clinical status.
METHODS: 29 patients underwent myelography with CT (CTM) and MRI in neutral and neck-extended positions. The imaging was assessed for the degree of cord compression and neural foraminal narrowing, quantified using a simple grading scheme suitable for routine clinical practice. The degree of neck extension was assessed using an angular measurement.
RESULTS: For both CTM and MRI, scanning with the neck extended significantly increases the severity of cord compression compared with the standard supine position, to a degree similar to that shown during conventional prone myelography. The degree of perceived cord compression is related to the degree of neck extension achieved. Correlation of standard MRI findings and the clinical level of radiculopathy is poor. This correlation improves when the neck is extended.
CONCLUSIONS: The most appropriate position for routine MRI of the cervical spine in degenerative disease remains unknown, but in selected patients imaging with the neck extended may provide important additional information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22215879      PMCID: PMC3587072          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/94315429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  29 in total

1.  Myelography: still the gold standard.

Authors:  Gary M Miller; William E Krauss
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Qualitative assessment of cervical spinal stenosis: observer variability on CT and MR images.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Stafira; Jagadeesh R Sonnad; William T C Yuh; David R Huard; Robin E Acker; Dan L Nguyen; Joan E Maley; Faridali G Ramji; Wen-Bin Li; Christopher M Loftus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT.

Authors:  U Dorenbeck; A G Schreyer; J Schlaier; P Held; S Feuerbach; J Seitz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Clinical and radiological correlates of severity and surgery-related outcome in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  A Singh; H A Crockard; A Platts; J Stevens
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Significance of CSF area measurements in cervical spondylitic myelopathy.

Authors:  A Golash; D Birchall; R D Laitt; A Jackson
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  CT myelographic findings in degenerative disorders of the cervical spine: clinical significance.

Authors:  L Penning; J T Wilmink; H H van Woerden; E Knol
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  T Kanchiku; T Taguchi; K Kaneko; Y Fuchigami; H Yonemura; S Kawai
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on magnetic resonance images in cervical compressive myelopathy. Does it predict the outcome of conservative treatment?

Authors:  M Matsumoto; Y Toyama; M Ishikawa; K Chiba; N Suzuki; Y Fujimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Cervical degenerative disease at flexion-extension MR imaging: prediction criteria.

Authors:  Chi-Jen Chen; Hui-Ling Hsu; Chi-Chien Niu; Tzu-Yung Chen; Min-Chi Chen; Ying-Chi Tseng; Yon-Cheong Wong; Li-Jen Wang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Effect of spinal cord signal intensity changes on clinical outcome after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Anooj Chatley; Raj Kumar; Vijendra K Jain; Sanjay Behari; Rabi Narayan Sahu
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-11
View more
  12 in total

1.  3D T2 MR Imaging-Based Measurements of the Posterior Cervical Thecal Sac in Flexion and Extension for Cervical Puncture.

Authors:  M P Bazylewicz; F Berkowitz; A Sayah
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Extension MRI is clinically useful in cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; A S Rigby; J Joseph; A Raman; A Kunnacherry; C A Rowland Hill
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.

Authors:  H-J Park; S S Kim; S-Y Lee; N-H Park; E-C Chung; M-H Rho; H-J Kwon; S-H Kook
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Kinetic DTI of the cervical spine: diffusivity changes in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Félix P Kuhn; Antoine Feydy; Nathalie Launay; Marie-Martine Lefevre-Colau; Serge Poiraudeau; Sébastien Laporte; Marc A Maier; Pavel Lindberg
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Characterizing the location of spinal and vertebral levels in the human cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  D W Cadotte; A Cadotte; J Cohen-Adad; D Fleet; M Livne; J R Wilson; D Mikulis; N Nugaeva; M G Fehlings
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Evaluation of Dynamic Foraminal Stenosis with Positional MRI in Patients with C6 Radiculopathy-Mimicking Pain: A Prospective Radiologic Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ozcan Kaya; Kerim Sariyilmaz; Yildiray Tutpinar; Mehmet Fevzi Cakmak; Mehmet Semih Cakir; Okan Ozkunt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  Comparison of two MR grading systems for correlation between grade of cervical neural foraminal stenosis and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  Kyu H Lee; Hee J Park; So Y Lee; Eun C Chung; Myung H Rho; Hyunchul Shin; Young J Kwon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Correlation of Foraminal Area and Response to Cervical Nerve Root Injections.

Authors:  Wilson Z Ray; Syed Akbari; Lubdha M Shah; Erica Bisson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-07-20

9.  Minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression using tubular retractor: The technical note and early clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jung-Woo Hur; Jin-Sung Kim; Myeong-Hoon Shin; Kyeong-Sik Ryu
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-03-15

10.  The Evaluation and Observation of "Hidden" Hypertrophy of Cervical Ligamentum Flavum, Cervical Canal, and Related Factors Using Kinetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Cheng Zeng; Jian Xiong; Jeffrey C Wang; Hirokazu Inoue; Yanlin Tan; Haijun Tian; Bayan Aghdasi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.