Literature DB >> 11287168

Comparison of two-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and two-dimensional turbo gradient spin echo sequences in MRI of the cervical spinal cord anatomy.

P Held1, J Seitz, R Fründ, W Nitz, M Lenhart, A Geissler.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the detectability and distinguishability of the cervical spinal cord, the anterior and posterior spinal roots and of the internal anatomy of the cord (distinction of grey and white matter). For this purpose 20 healthy volunteers were examined using a 1.5 T MR unit with 20 mT/m gradient strength and a dedicated circular polarized neck array coil. Three T2* weighted (w). 2D gradient echo sequences, two T2 w. 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences and one T2 w. 2D turbo gradient spin echo (TGSE) sequence were compared. The multiecho 2D fast low angle shot (FLASH) sequence with magnetization transfer saturation pulse (me FLASH+MTS) yielded the best results for liquor/compact bone, liquor/spinal cord and grey/white matter contrast, as found with regions of interest (ROI) analysis. The single echo 2D FLASH sequence was significantly poorer than the two me FLASH+/-MTS sequences. Two-dimensional TGSE as well as 2D TSE with a 256 matrix and with a 512 matrix yielded the poorest results. In the visual analysis the contrast between liquor and compact bone, liquor and cord as well as liquor and roots was best with me FLASH+MTS, whereas grey/white matter distinction was best using me FLASH-MTS. In conclusion, we would therefore recommend the inclusion of an axial T2* w. multiecho 2D spoiled gradient echo sequence with magnetization transfer saturation pulse and gradient motion rephasing in a MR imaging protocol of the cervical spine.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11287168     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(00)00253-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

1.  Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT.

Authors:  U Dorenbeck; A G Schreyer; J Schlaier; P Held; S Feuerbach; J Seitz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  [Imaging cervical myelo- and radiculopathy].

Authors:  C Roth; P Papanagiotou; C Krick; W Reith; I Q Grunwald
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Construction of an in vivo human spinal cord atlas based on high-resolution MR images at cervical and thoracic levels: preliminary results.

Authors:  Manuel Taso; Arnaud Le Troter; Michaël Sdika; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Maxime Guye; Monique Bernard; Virginie Callot
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences.

Authors:  T Meindl; S Wirth; S Weckbach; O Dietrich; M Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Segmentation of the human spinal cord.

Authors:  Benjamin De Leener; Manuel Taso; Julien Cohen-Adad; Virginie Callot
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Qualitative and quantitative assessment of isotropic ankle magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional isotropic intermediate-weighted turbo spin echo versus three-dimensional isotropic fast field echo sequences.

Authors:  Hyun Su Kim; Young Cheol Yoon; Jong Won Kwon; Bong-Keun Choe
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Usefulness of multiecho fast field echo MRI in the evaluation of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and dural ossification of the cervical spine.

Authors:  So-Yeon Lee; Yu Ri Shin; Hee Jin Park; Myung Ho Rho; Eun Chul Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical foraminal stenosis: comparison of 3D T2 SPACE with sagittal oblique 2D T2 TSE.

Authors:  I Barnaure; J Galley; B Fritz; R Sutter
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The use of the lumbosacral enlargement as an intrinsic imaging biomarker: feasibility of grey matter and white matter cross-sectional area measurements using MRI at 3T.

Authors:  Marios C Yiannakas; Puneet Kakar; Luke R Hoy; David H Miller; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.