Literature DB >> 1902019

Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging.

J S Tsuruda1, K Remley.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vitro the effects of magnetic susceptibility and motion on the estimation of neural foraminal diameter with three-dimensional Fourier transformation (3DFT) gradient-recalled MR imaging as compared with CT. A cervical spine phantom was constructed from desiccated human cervical vertebral bodies embedded in a water-based proteinaceous gel. The phantom was imaged with thin-section 1.5-mm axial CT and 1.5-mm axial 3DFT gradient-recalled MR using a constant TR (35 msec) and flip angle (5 degrees), while the TE was varied from 11 to 22 msec. During imaging, the phantom either was kept stationary or underwent subtle, intermittent motion. Compared with CT, MR consistently underestimated the diameters of the neural foramina, leading to overestimation of neural foraminal stenosis. The degree of over-estimation varied directly with increasing TE values, from 8% (TE = 11 msec) to 27% (TE = 22 msec). Motion artifacts also increased foraminal overestimation and mimicked osseous hypertrophy. The effect of image degradation due to motion was noted to increase with longer TE values. Image degradation caused by magnetic susceptibility and motion artifacts can be minimized by using the shortest TE possible. We do not recommend the use of 3DFT gradient-recalled MR imaging for the evaluation of cervical radiculopathy if patient motion is anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1902019      PMCID: PMC8331405     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  5 in total

1.  Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT.

Authors:  U Dorenbeck; A G Schreyer; J Schlaier; P Held; S Feuerbach; J Seitz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; C A Rowland Hill; A S Rigby; S Chandrasekaran; H Narayanamurthy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences.

Authors:  T Meindl; S Wirth; S Weckbach; O Dietrich; M Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  R J Bartlett; C A Hill; R Devlin; E D Gardiner
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Characteristics of spondylotic myelopathy on 3D driven-equilibrium fast spin echo and 2D fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mike A Abdulhadi; Joseph R Perno; Elias R Melhem; Paolo G P Nucifora
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.