Literature DB >> 18813933

Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences.

T Meindl1, S Wirth, S Weckbach, O Dietrich, M Reiser, S O Schoenberg.   

Abstract

To compare an isotropic three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution T2-weighted (w) MR sequence and its reformations with conventional sequences for imaging of the cervical spine. Fifteen volunteers were examined at 1.5 T using sagittal and axial 3D T2-w, sagittal and axial 2D T2w, and axial 2D T2*w MR sequences. Axial reformations of the sagittal 3D dataset were generated (3D MPR T2w). Signal-to-noise and image homogeneity were evaluated in a phantom and in vivo. Visibility of ten anatomical structures of the cervical spine was evaluated. Artifacts were assessed. For statistical analysis, Cohen's kappa, Wilcoxon matched pairs, and t-testing were utilized. There were no significant differences in homogeneity between the sequences. Sagittal 3D T2w enabled better delineation of nerve roots, neural foramina, and intraforaminal structures compared to sagittal 2D T2w. Axial 3D T2w and axial 3D MPR T2w resulted in superior visibility of most anatomical structures compared to axial 2D T2w and comparable results to 2D T2*w concerning the spinal cord, nerve roots, intraforaminal structures, and fat. Artifacts were most pronounced in axial 2D T2w and axial 3D T2w. Acquisition of a 3D T2w data set is feasible in the cervical spine with superior delineation of anatomical structures compared to 2D sequences.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18813933     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1175-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of two-dimensional gradient echo, turbo spin echo and two-dimensional turbo gradient spin echo sequences in MRI of the cervical spinal cord anatomy.

Authors:  P Held; J Seitz; R Fründ; W Nitz; M Lenhart; A Geissler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  MR imaging of intradural tumors of the cervical spine.

Authors:  R R Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  J P Mugler; S Bao; R V Mulkern; C R Guttmann; R L Robertson; F A Jolesz; J R Brookeman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Degenerative diseases of the cervical spine: comparison of a multiecho data image combination sequence with a magnetisation transfer saturation pulse and cervical myelography and CT.

Authors:  U Dorenbeck; A G Schreyer; J Schlaier; P Held; S Feuerbach; J Seitz
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Degenerative spine disorders in the context of clinical findings.

Authors:  Michael Freund; Klaus Sartor
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Trauma radiology: Part V. Imaging of acute cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  S E Mirvis; K Shanmuganathan
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.510

Review 8.  MR imaging of the spine: recent advances in pulse sequences and special techniques.

Authors:  B A Georgy; J R Hesselink
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Effects of magnetic susceptibility artifacts and motion in evaluating the cervical neural foramina on 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  J S Tsuruda; K Remley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  MR angiography of the spine and spinal cord.

Authors:  Pradip M Pattany; Efrat Saraf-Lavi; Brian C Bowen
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-12
View more
  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of lumber nerve root compression using thin-slice thickness coronal magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional fat-suppressed multi-shot balanced non-steady-state free precession versus three-dimensional T1-weighted spoiled gradient-recalled echo.

Authors:  Keizo Tanitame; Nobuko Tanitame; Chihiro Tani; Masaki Ishikawa; Miyuki Takasu; Shuji Date; Keiko Otani; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid spaces imaging using a pulse-triggered three-dimensional turbo spin echo MR sequence with variable flip-angle distribution.

Authors:  Jérôme Hodel; Jonathan Silvera; Olivier Bekaert; Alain Rahmouni; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin; Alexandre Vignaud; Eric Petit; Bruno Durning; Philippe Decq
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  3D T2 MR Imaging-Based Measurements of the Posterior Cervical Thecal Sac in Flexion and Extension for Cervical Puncture.

Authors:  M P Bazylewicz; F Berkowitz; A Sayah
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Imaging of the entire cerebrospinal fluid volume with a multistation 3D SPACE MR sequence: feasibility study in patients with hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Jérôme Hodel; Alain Lebret; Eric Petit; Xavier Leclerc; Marc Zins; Alexandre Vignaud; Philippe Decq; Alain Rahmouni
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Clinical utility of optimized three-dimensional T1-, T2-, and T2*-weighted sequences in spinal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nobuko Tanitame; Keizo Tanitame; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Uterine cervical carcinoma: a comparison of two- and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T for image quality and local-regional staging.

Authors:  Y R Shin; S E Rha; B G Choi; S N Oh; M Y Park; J Y Byun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Fast and accurate semi-automated segmentation method of spinal cord MR images at 3T applied to the construction of a cervical spinal cord template.

Authors:  Mohamed-Mounir El Mendili; Raphaël Chen; Brice Tiret; Noémie Villard; Stéphanie Trunet; Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac; Stéphane Lehéricy; Pierre-François Pradat; Habib Benali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characteristics of spondylotic myelopathy on 3D driven-equilibrium fast spin echo and 2D fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mike A Abdulhadi; Joseph R Perno; Elias R Melhem; Paolo G P Nucifora
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced isotropic 3D-GRE-T1WI sequence versus conventional non-isotropic sequence on preoperative staging of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoduo Yu; Meng Lin; Feng Ye; Han Ouyang; Yan Chen; Chunwu Zhou; Zihua Su
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Three-Dimensional Sequence for Lumbar Nerve Root with Intervertebral Foramen.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takashima; Tsuneo Takebayashi; Hiroki Shishido; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Rui Imamura; Yoshihiro Akatsuka; Yoshinori Terashima; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Masateru Nagae; Toshikazu Kubo; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.