Literature DB >> 15016753

Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese.

Y Yamaji1, T Mitsushima, H Ikuma, H Watabe, M Okamoto, T Kawabe, R Wada, H Doi, M Omata.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whereas high recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas after polypectomy are widely recognised, little is known of the natural incidence in those with no neoplastic lesions initially. It is also known that single colonoscopy has a significant miss rate. AIMS: To elucidate the incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal neoplasms from a large cohort of asymptomatic Japanese patients on the basis of annually repeated colonoscopies.
METHODS: A total of 6225 subjects (4659 men and 1566 women) participating in an annual colonoscopic screening programme and completing three or more colonoscopies were analysed during the 14 year period between 1988 and 2002. Patients were divided into three groups according to the findings of the initial two colonoscopies: 4084 subjects with no neoplasm, 1818 with small adenomas <10 mm, and 323 with advanced lesions, including carcinoma in situ, severe dysplasia, or large adenomas > or =10 mm. Mean age at the second colonoscopy was 48.8 years.
RESULTS: For all types of colorectal neoplasms, the incidence rate in those with no initial neoplasm was 7.2%/year whereas recurrence rates in those with small adenomas and advanced lesions were 19.3% and 22.9%/year, respectively. For advanced colorectal lesions, the incidence rate was 0.21%/year whereas recurrence rates in those with small adenomas and advanced lesions were 0.64% and 1.88%/year, respectively. Colorectal neoplasms were in general more likely to develop in males and older subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Although recurrence rates after polypectomy were elevated, the incidence rates in subjects with no neoplastic lesions initially were quite high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15016753      PMCID: PMC1774009          DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.026112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  25 in total

1.  Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps.

Authors:  L J Hixson; M B Fennerty; R E Sampliner; H S Garewal
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development.

Authors:  B Vogelstein; E R Fearon; S R Hamilton; S E Kern; A C Preisinger; M Leppert; Y Nakamura; R White; A M Smits; J L Bos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  T Muto; H J Bussey; B C Morson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Screening for colorectal cancer in Chinese: comparison of fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.

Authors:  Joseph J Y Sung; Francis K L Chan; Wai K Leung; Justin C Y Wu; James Y W Lau; Jessica Ching; Ka F To; Yuk T Lee; Yiu W Luk; Nelson N S Kung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Michael K W Li; S C Sydney Chung
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy.

Authors:  G Nusko; U Mansmann; Th Kirchner; E G Hahn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David R Wagner; Ching Y Lin; Gregory N Larkin; James D Rogge; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M J O'Brien; M N Ho; L Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; J Bond; M Schapiro; E T Stewart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas: a prospective study.

Authors:  A I Neugut; J S Jacobson; H Ahsan; J Santos; G C Garbowski; K A Forde; M R Treat; J Waye
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  36 in total

1.  Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Guh Jung Seo; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Chang Won Hong; Byung Chang Kim; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The influence of waiting times on cost-effectiveness: a case study of colorectal cancer mass screening.

Authors:  Pauline Chauvin; Jean-Michel Josselin; Denis Heresbach
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-08-22

3.  Gamma-tocopherol attenuates moderate but not severe colitis and suppresses moderate colitis-promoted colon tumorigenesis in mice.

Authors:  Qing Jiang; Ziying Jiang; Yava Jones Hall; Yumi Jang; Paul W Snyder; Carol Bain; Jianjie Huang; Amber Jannasch; Bruce Cooper; Yun Wang; Michelle Moreland
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 7.376

4.  Incremental net benefit and acceptability of alternative health policies: a case study of mass screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pauline Chauvin; Jean-Michel Josselin; Denis Heresbach
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-02-09

5.  Proposal of high-risk adenoma detection rate as an impactful, complementary quality indicator of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vaibhav Wadhwa; Yash Jobanputra; Haider Al Taii; Prashanthi N Thota; Rocio Lopez; Suryakanth R Gurudu; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Seun Ja Park; Jong Hoon Lee; Tae Oh Kim; Hyun Jin Kim; Hyung Wook Kim; Sang Heon Lee; Dong Hoon Baek; Busan Ulsan Gyeongnam Intestinal Study Group Society Bigs
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Invasive carcinomas may arise in colorectal adenomas with high-grade dysplasia and with carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Carlos A Rubio; John G Delinassios
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2010-01-08

Review 8.  Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?

Authors:  Stewart N Bonnington; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Risk of advanced metachronous colorectal adenoma during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  G Nusko; E G Hahn; U Mansmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Simple colonoscopy reporting system checking the detection rate of colon polyps.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Youn Jung Choi; Hye Jung Kwon; Seun Ja Park; Moo In Park; Won Moon; Sung Eun Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.