Literature DB >> 8474513

Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

J S Mandel1, J H Bond, T R Church, D C Snover, G M Bradley, L M Schuman, F Ederer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although tests for occult blood in the feces are widely used to screen for colorectal cancers, there is no conclusive evidence that they reduce mortality from this cause. We evaluated a fecal occult-blood test in a randomized trial and documented its effectiveness.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 46,551 participants 50 to 80 years of age to screening for colorectal cancer once a year, to screening every two years, or to a control group. Participants who were screened submitted six guaiac-impregnated paper slides with two smears from each of three consecutive stools. About 83 percent of the slides were rehydrated. Participants who tested positive underwent a diagnostic evaluation that included colonoscopy. Vital status was ascertained for all study participants during 13 years of follow-up. A committee determined causes of death. A single pathologist determined the stage of each tissue specimen. Differences in mortality from colorectal cancer, the primary study end point, were monitored with the sequential log-rank statistic.
RESULTS: The 13-year cumulative mortality per 1000 from colorectal cancer was 5.88 in the annually screened group (95 percent confidence interval, 4.61 to 7.15), 8.33 in the biennially screened group (95 percent confidence interval, 6.82 to 9.84), and 8.83 in the control group (95 percent confidence interval, 7.26 to 10.40). The rate in the annually screened group, but not in the biennially screened group, was significantly lower than that in the control group. Reduced mortality in the annually screened group was accompanied by improved survival in those with colorectal cancer and a shift to detection at an earlier stage of cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Annual fecal occult-blood testing with rehydration of the samples decreased the 13-year cumulative mortality from colorectal cancer by 33 percent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8474513     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199305133281901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  760 in total

1.  Prostate cancer screening: should family physicians discuss it with their patients?

Authors:  M Greiver
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Variation in recommendations for cancer screening among primary care physicians in New Mexico.

Authors:  C J Herman; R M Hoffman; K K Altobelli
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-08

3.  Timing of surgery during the menstrual cycle and prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  R A Badwe; I Mittra; R Havaldar
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  Genetic progression in the pancreatic ducts.

Authors:  R H Hruban; R E Wilentz; S E Kern
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Colorectal cancer screening in the UK: Joint Position Statement by the British Society of Gastroenterology, The Royal College of Physicians, and The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Rhodes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Enough guidelines already.

Authors:  S Roedde
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.

Authors:  C D Johnson; D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Surgical treatment of cancer of the colon or rectum. Patient Care Committee of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT).

Authors: 
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Molecular stool screening for colorectal cancer. Using DNA markers may be beneficial, but large scale evaluation is needed.

Authors:  D A Ahlquist
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29

10.  Protective effect of faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer: worse prognosis for screening refusers.

Authors:  Y Niv; M Lev-El; G Fraser; G Abuksis; A Tamir
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.