Literature DB >> 26877600

Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?

Stewart N Bonnington1, Matthew D Rutter1.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. The identification of colonic polyps can reduce CRC mortality through earlier diagnosis of cancers and the removal of polyps: the precursor lesion of CRC. Following the finding and removal of colonic polyps at an initial colonoscopy, some patients are at an increased risk of developing CRC in the future. This is the rationale for post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy. However, not all individuals found to have colonic adenomas have a risk of CRC higher than that of the general population. This review examines the literature on post-polypectomy surveillance including current international clinical guidelines. The potential benefits of surveillance procedures must be weighed against the burden of colonoscopy: resource use, the potential for patient discomfort, and the risk of complications. Therefore surveillance colonoscopy is best utilised in a selected group of individuals at a high risk of developing cancer. Further study is needed into the specific factors conferring higher risk as well as the efficacy of surveillance in mitigating this risk. Such evidence will better inform clinicians and patients of the relative benefits of colonoscopic surveillance for the individual. In addition, the decision to continue with surveillance must be informed by the changing profile of risks and benefits of further procedures with the patient's advancing age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Polyp; Surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26877600      PMCID: PMC4726668          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.1925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  78 in total

1.  The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  M J O'Brien; S J Winawer; A G Zauber; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; B Diaz; G R Dickersin; S Ewing; S Geller; D Kasimian
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons with negative fecal occult blood tests.

Authors:  D K Rex; G A Lehman; R H Hawes; T M Ulbright; J J Smith
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Follow-up of hot biopsy forceps treatment of diminutive colonic polyps.

Authors:  F Peluso; F Goldner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men.

Authors:  J A DiSario; P G Foutch; H D Mai; K Pardy; R K Manne
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas.

Authors:  W S Atkin; B C Morson; J Cuzick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M J O'Brien; M N Ho; L Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; J Bond; M Schapiro; E T Stewart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Eradication of diminutive polyps: a prospective evaluation of bipolar coagulation versus conventional biopsy removal.

Authors:  A Woods; R A Sanowski; D D Wadas; R K Manne; S W Friess
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Natural history of adenomas.

Authors:  T J Eide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study.

Authors:  O D Jørgensen; O Kronborg; C Fenger
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  17 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic parameters associated with postoperative complications and risk factors for tumor recurrence and mortality after tumor resection of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Z Bai; J Wang; T Wang; Y Li; X Zhao; G Wu; Y Yang; W Deng; Z Zhang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy for follow-up of patients with left-sided diverticulitis.

Authors:  Z Abdulazeez; N Kukreja; N Qureshi; S Lascelles
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Amir Qaseem; Carolyn J Crandall; Reem A Mustafa; Lauri A Hicks; Timothy J Wilt; Mary Ann Forciea; Nick Fitterman; Carrie A Horwitch; Devan Kansagara; Michael Maroto; Robert M McLean; Jairo Roa; Janice Tufte
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Transcriptome of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells: a link between diabetes and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Reem Saleh; Varun Sasidharan Nair; Khaled Murshed; Mohamed Abu Nada; Eyad Elkord; Ranad Shaheen
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 6.968

5.  Identification of key candidate genes and pathways associated with colorectal aberrant crypt foci-to-adenoma-to-carcinoma progression.

Authors:  Setareh Fayazfar; Afsaneh Arefi Oskouie; Akram Safaei; Hakimeh Zali; Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2021

Review 6.  Evolution and progression of Barrett's oesophagus to oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Killcoyne; Rebecca C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Factors predicting occurrence and therapeutic choice in malignant colorectal polyps: a study of 13 years of colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Sergiu Marian Cazacu; Adrian Săftoiu; Sevastiţa Iordache; Mirela Corina Ghiluşi; Claudia Valentina Georgescu; Vlad Florin Iovănescu; Carmen Daniela Neagoe; Liliana Streba; Mihaela Caliţa; Elena Daniela Burtea; Dan Cârţu; Polliana Mihaela Leru
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.833

8.  Differential effects of glucose and N-acetylglucosamine on genome instability.

Authors:  Yuan-Sheng Hsu; Pei-Jung Wu; Yung-Ming Jeng; Chun-Mei Hu; Wen-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.942

9.  Frequency of colonic adenomatous polyps in a tertiary hospital in Mumbai.

Authors:  Anjali D Amarapurkar; Prachi Nichat; Nitin Narawane; Deepak Amarapurkar
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-10

10.  Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG).

Authors:  Kevin J Monahan; Nicola Bradshaw; Sunil Dolwani; Bianca Desouza; Malcolm G Dunlop; James E East; Mohammad Ilyas; Asha Kaur; Fiona Lalloo; Andrew Latchford; Matthew D Rutter; Ian Tomlinson; Huw J W Thomas; James Hill
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.