Literature DB >> 12050337

Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age.

Thomas F Imperiale1, David R Wagner, Ching Y Lin, Gregory N Larkin, James D Rogge, David F Ransohoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of colorectal lesions in persons 40 to 49 years of age, as identified on colonoscopy, has not been determined.
METHODS: We reviewed the procedure and pathology reports for 906 consecutive persons 40 to 49 years of age who voluntarily participated in an employer-based screening-colonoscopy program. The histologic features of lesions that were identified and removed on endoscopy were categorized according to those of the most advanced lesion removed proximally (up to the junction of the splenic flexure and the descending colon) and the most advanced lesion removed distally. An advanced lesion was defined as an adenoma at least 1 cm in diameter, a polyp with villous histologic features or severe dysplasia, or a cancer.
RESULTS: Among those who underwent colonoscopic screening, 78.9 percent had no detected lesions, 10.0 percent had hyperplastic polyps, 8.7 percent had tubular adenomas, and 3.5 percent had advanced neoplasms, none of which were cancerous (95 percent confidence interval for cancer, 0 to 0.4 percent). Eighteen of 33 advanced neoplasms (55 percent) were located distally and were potentially within reach of a sigmoidoscope. If these results are applicable to the general population, at least 250 persons, and perhaps 1000 or more, would need to be screened to detect one cancer in this age group.
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic detection of colorectal cancer is uncommon in asymptomatic persons 40 to 49 years of age. The noncancerous lesions are equally distributed proximally and distally. The low yield of screening colonoscopy in this age group is consistent with current recommendations about the age at which to begin screening in persons at average risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12050337     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200206063462304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  72 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer incidence trends in the United States and United kingdom: evidence of right- to left-sided biological gradients with implications for screening.

Authors:  Rafael Meza; Jihyoun Jeon; Andrew G Renehan; E Georg Luebeck
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Prevalence of any size adenomas and advanced adenomas in 40- to 49-year-old individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy because of a family history of colorectal carcinoma in a first-degree relative.

Authors:  Akshay K Gupta; Jewel Samadder; Eric Elliott; Saurabh Sethi; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  [Colorectal cancer in Germany. Means for prevention and early detection: implications for laiety and physicians].

Authors:  A Eickhoff; C Maar; B Birkner; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  The quality of colonoscopy services--responsibilities of referring clinicians: a consensus statement of the Quality Assurance Task Group, National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Authors:  Robert H Fletcher; Marion R Nadel; John I Allen; Jason A Dominitz; Douglas O Faigel; David A Johnson; Dorothy S Lane; David Lieberman; John B Pope; Michael B Potter; Deborah P Robin; Paul C Schroy; Robert A Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Christoph Schramm; Nadine Mbaya; Jeremy Franklin; Muenevver Demir; Fabian Kuetting; Ulrich Toex; Tobias Goeser; Hans-Michael Steffen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Detection of colorectal neoplasia by colonoscopy in average-risk patients age 40-49 versus 50-59 years.

Authors:  Matthew N Thoma; Fernando Castro; Mushfeka Golawala; Ren Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic liver-transplant recipients.

Authors:  J J Koornstra; J Wesseling; A E de Jong; H F A Vasen; J H Kleibeuker; E B Haagsma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in patients with end-stage renal disease: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sharon Lee; Nir Wasserberg; Patrizio Petrone; Jason Rosca; Rick Selby; Adrian Ortega; Howard S Kaufman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The average-risk age threshold for colorectal cancer screening: should it be lowered?

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Prevalence of colorectal neoplasms in young, average risk individuals: A turning tide between East and West.

Authors:  Ari Leshno; Menachem Moshkowitz; Maayan David; Lior Galazan; Alfred I Neugut; Nadir Arber; Erwin Santo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.