Literature DB >> 18597098

Risk of advanced metachronous colorectal adenoma during long-term follow-up.

G Nusko1, E G Hahn, U Mansmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to the adenoma-carcinoma concept, all colorectal adenomas are to be removed and all patients have to undergo regular surveillance examinations. But there is still shortage on information on the long-term results of follow-up colonoscopy after polypectomy.
METHODS: Between 1978 and 2003, more than 20,000 polyps were prospectively documented at the Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Polyps. A total of 1,091 patients undergoing periodic surveillance examinations are studied for differences between initial and metachronous lesions of the colorectum. Statistical analysis using chi (2)-testing of adenoma characteristics found in four subsequent recurrence periods and calculation of the relative risk (RR) for the development of metachronous adenomas of advanced pathology was performed.
RESULTS: In comparison with the initial findings, metachronous adenomas are, in general, significantly smaller ones (p < 0.00001), more frequently tubular lesions (p < 0.00001) and bearing less often high-grade dysplasia (p < 0.00001). Adenomas of advanced pathology were significantly less often found during follow-up than at baseline examination (p < 0.0001). These differences are found between the initial and four subsequent generations of metachronous adenomas. Patients with adenomas of advanced pathology at baseline have a significantly higher risk for metachronous adenomas of advanced pathology (RR 1.51; 95%CI 1.04-1.93) at the first recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Metachronous adenomas show uniform characteristics of being small tubular lesions rarely bearing high-grade dysplasia. Thus, regular surveillance examinations can provide sufficient colorectal carcinoma prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18597098     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0508-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  60 in total

1.  Usefulness of performing colonoscopy one year after endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  I K Woolfson; G J Eckholdt; C R Wetzel; J B Gathright; J E Ray; T C Hicks; A E Timmcke; B T Ferrari
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Recurrence rates for colorectal polyps.

Authors:  A I Neugut; C M Johnsen; K A Forde; M R Treat
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Polypectomy of adenomas in the prevention of colorectal cancer: 10 years' follow-up of the Telemark Polyp Study I. A prospective, controlled population study.

Authors:  G Hoff; J Sauar; M H Vatn; S Larsen; F Langmark; I E Moen; A Foerster; E Thiis-Evensen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Growth of colorectal polyps: recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps of less than 10 mm, 1 year after detection.

Authors:  B Hofstad; M Vatn; S Larsen; M Osnes
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  W Matek; I Guggenmoos-Holzmann; L Demling
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  New occurrence and recurrence of neoplasms within 5 years of a screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Avidan; Amnon Sonnenberg; Thomas G Schnell; Jack Leya; Adrienne Metz; Stephen J Sontag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence.

Authors:  C Bonithon-Kopp; F Piard; C Fenger; E Cabeza; C O'Morain; O Kronborg; J Faivre
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  R U van Stolk; G J Beck; J A Baron; R Haile; R Summers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  J D Waye; S Braunfeld
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Follow-up after polypectomy.

Authors:  S J Winawer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  6 in total

1.  Difference in expression of two neurokinin-1 receptors in adenoma and carcinoma from patients that underwent radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xia Gao; Zhenjun Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Advanced colorectal adenoma related gene expression signature may predict prognostic for colorectal cancer patients with adenoma-carcinoma sequence.

Authors:  Bing Li; Xiao-Yu Shi; Dai-Xiang Liao; Bang-Rong Cao; Cheng-Hua Luo; Shu-Jun Cheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

3.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Yusuke Saitoh; Takahisa Matsuda; Masahiro Igarashi; Takayuki Matsumoto; Yasushi Iwao; Yasumoto Suzuki; Hiroshi Nishida; Toshiaki Watanabe; Tamotsu Sugai; Ken-Ichi Sugihara; Osamu Tsuruta; Ichiro Hirata; Nobuo Hiwatashi; Hiroshi Saito; Mamoru Watanabe; Kentaro Sugano; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  A prognostic model for advanced colorectal neoplasia recurrence.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Karen Messer; John A Baron; David A Lieberman; Elizabeth T Jacobs; Amanda J Cross; Gwen Murphy; Maria Elena Martinez; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; James East; Colin J Rees; Neil Cripps; James Docherty; Sunil Dolwani; Philip V Kaye; Kevin J Monahan; Marco R Novelli; Andrew Plumb; Brian P Saunders; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Damian J M Tolan; Sophie Whyte; Stewart Bonnington; Alison Scope; Ruth Wong; Barbara Hibbert; John Marsh; Billie Moores; Amanda Cross; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 31.793

6.  Predictors of colorectal polyp recurrence after the first polypectomy in private practice settings: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jean-François Viel; Jean-Marie Studer; Yves Ottignon; Jean-Pierre Hirsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.