Literature DB >> 14747926

[The radical retropubic prostatectomy -- gold standard for prostate cancer?].

R Thiel1.   

Abstract

Radical retropubic prostatectomy is still the most frequent surgical procedure for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Improvements in the surgical techniques have contributed to significant reduction in operative time (median 69 min) and in rates of early and late complications. The surgical procedure and perioperative management are described, and results in 180 consecutive cases are presented. Severe postoperative complications did not occur. More than 95% of patients were completely dry within 6 months. Erectile function recovered in 71% of patients with bilateral preservation of the neurovascular bundles and in 34% of patients with unilateral nerve sparing. These results are in good agreement with data from the literature and confirm the outstanding role of the retropubic approach as the gold standard for radical prostatectomy, as well as the reproducibility of the result in community-based hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14747926     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-003-0470-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  13 in total

1.  Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002.

Authors:  Herbert Augustin; Peter Hammerer; Markus Graefen; Jüri Palisaar; Joachim Noldus; Salvador Fernandez; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Othmar Seemann; Michael Schulze; Dogu Teber; Martin Hatzinger; Thomas Frede
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Rise and fall of radical prostatectomy rates from 1989 to 1996.

Authors:  Kazim Sheikh; Claudia Bullock
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M W Kattan; J A Eastham; A M Stapleton; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: morbidity and urinary continence in 418 consecutive cases.

Authors:  R E Hautmann; T W Sauter; U K Wenderoth
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  F Rabbani; A M Stapleton; M W Kattan; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A W Partin; J Yoo; H B Carter; J D Pearson; D W Chan; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach.

Authors:  H A Frazier; J E Robertson; D F Paulson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years.

Authors:  P C Walsh; A W Partin; J I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Decreased number of R1-resections in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Use of a newly developed fast sectioning technique].

Authors:  P M Braun; K Meyer-Schell; C Seif; S Hautmann; I Leuschner; G Klöppel; K-P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Clinical pathways. Implementation in a urological department].

Authors:  R Thiel; K Eisenblätter; M Kurzidem; P Hutmacher; A Herde; H A Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Seminal vesicle sparing radical perineal prostatectomy].

Authors:  S Schäfers; P de Geeter; H Löhmer; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Johanna Wasserscheid; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Thilo Schwalenberg; Alan McNeill; Costantinos Constantinides; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Roman Ganzer; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.