Literature DB >> 12565767

Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002.

Herbert Augustin1, Peter Hammerer, Markus Graefen, Jüri Palisaar, Joachim Noldus, Salvador Fernandez, Hartwig Huland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To up date counselling of patients in an experienced center, we assessed intraoperative and perioperative complications in a consecutive series of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: In a prospective study, we analyzed all intraoperative and perioperative complications within 30 days in a consecutive series of 1243 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between January 1999 and February 2002. All adverse events were graduated in major and minor complications by their severity and sequel.
RESULTS: There were no deaths. Overall, 996 patients (80.2%) were not affected by any complication. Major complications were observed in 50 patients (4.0%), minor complications in 197 (15.8%). Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 861 (69.3%) patients. This procedure was associated with a significantly higher rate of lymphoceles requiring a drainage, 4.2% versus 0.3% (p<0.006) and a higher rate of deep venous thrombosis, 1.4% versus 0.5% (p<0.2), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Radical retropubic prostatectomy is a safe surgical procedure. Postoperatively the majority of our patients was not compromised by any complication within 30 days. Furthermore, due to a higher rate of lymphoceles and thromboembolic events the indication for pelvic lymphadenectomy should be considered carefully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12565767     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00495-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  42 in total

Review 1.  [Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  U Michl; M Graefen; J Noldus; T Eggert; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].

Authors:  J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Technique of nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Graefen; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  The effect of annual surgical caseload on the rates of in-hospital pneumonia and other in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jan Schmitges; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Marco Bianchi; Maxine Sun; Firas Abdollah; Sascha A Ahyai; Claudio Jeldres; Thomas Steuber; Paul Perrotte; Shahrokh F Shariat; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Seperation of dorsal vein complex from the urethra by blunt finger dissection during radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ali Atan; Altuğ Tuncel; Fazlı Polat; Melih Balcı; Süleyman Yeşil; Ersin Köseoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

Review 6.  [Fast-track surgery in radical retropubic prostatectomy. First experiences with a comprehensive program to enhance postoperative convalescence].

Authors:  H Heinzer; R Heuer; O V Nordenflycht; C Eichelberg; P Friederich; A E Goetz; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [Decreased number of R1-resections in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Use of a newly developed fast sectioning technique].

Authors:  P M Braun; K Meyer-Schell; C Seif; S Hautmann; I Leuschner; G Klöppel; K-P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  [New concept minimizes bleeding in radical retropubic prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Schostak; K Matischak; M Schäfer; M Müller; M Schrader; F Christoph; K Miller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Laparoscopic pelvic surgery: Where do we stand in the year 2006?].

Authors:  J Rassweiler; D Teber; J de la Rosette; P Laguna; V Pansodoro; T Frede
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Identification and conservative management of a distal ureteral injury occurring during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  R E Krasnow; M S Wingo; R J Leveille
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.