Literature DB >> 8116133

Radical retropubic prostatectomy: morbidity and urinary continence in 418 consecutive cases.

R E Hautmann1, T W Sauter, U K Wenderoth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate morbidity and mortality after standard retropubic radical prostatectomy with special attention to postoperative urinary continence.
METHODS: Four hundred eighteen consecutive patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for treatment of localized prostatic cancer were reviewed. Both clinical and pathologic staging was assessed retrospectively according to the new TNM classification (International Union Against Cancer, 1992). Postoperative urinary continence was assessed according to the criteria of the International Continence Society.
RESULTS: There were no operative deaths. Perioperative mortality was 1.2 percent, with 3 patients dying of myocardial infarction and 2 of pulmonary embolism after uneventful operations. Rectal injury, which was primarily closed, occurred in 2.9 percent. In 1 case (0.2%), reimplantation of the left ureter had to be performed. A total of 20 patients (4.7%) required reoperation: abscess 1.7 percent; postoperative hemorrhage, 1.7 percent; anastomotic urinary leakage, 1.2 percent: massive lymphocele, 0.2 percent. Complications that were treated conservatively occurred in 73 patients (17.4%): lymphocele, 6.4 percent; hemorrhage, 5.7 percent; thromboembolism, 2.6 percent; secondary wound healing, 2.6 percent. Of all patients who were followed for one year or longer, 80 percent achieved complete urinary control or reported occasional spotting only; 15 percent experienced stress incontinence grade II; and 3 percent were totally incontinent.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite extensive surgical experience, our continence rates are far from the optimistic 1-3 percent incontinence rates reported in the literature. In our experience, radical retropubic prostatectomy can be performed with acceptable morbidity and without significantly affecting the quality of life in the majority of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8116133     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90218-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  14 in total

1.  Minimizing complications during retropubic radical prostatectomy - Is ureteral stenting necessary?

Authors:  B Schlenker; C Gratzke; M Seitz; P von Walter; D Tilki; O Reich; D Zaak; C G Stief; M J Bader
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre De La Taille; Leif E Olsson; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Laparoscopic prostatectomy: where do we stand?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Localized prostate cancer: early intervention or expectant therapy?

Authors:  T R Griffiths; D E Neal
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Treatment- and disease-related complications of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne R Simoneau
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

6.  Venous thromboembolism in urologic surgery: prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Kevin R Rice; Stephen A Brassell; David G McLeod
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

Review 7.  Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiu-Wu Pan; Xin-Ming Cui; Jing-Fei Teng; Dong-Xu Zhang; Zhi-Jun Wang; Fa-Jun Qu; Yi Gao; Xin-Gang Cui; Dan-Feng Xu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Surgical learning curve for open radical prostatectomy: Is there an end to the learning curve?

Authors:  Alexander Kretschmer; Philipp Mandel; Alexander Buchner; Christian G Stief; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  [The revival of "uroscopy": an easy way to evaluate the anastomotic region after radical retropubic prostatectomy].

Authors:  M Schenck; T Szarvas; H Ruebben; T Jaeger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Seminal vesicle sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using a low-energy source: Better continence and potency.

Authors:  Shrenik J Shah; Vishal Goyal; Rajesh Sachar; Arup Kumar Nath; Nitesh Jain; Kalpesh Kapadia
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.