Literature DB >> 7685418

The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer.

A W Partin1, J Yoo, H B Carter, J D Pearson, D W Chan, J I Epstein, P C Walsh.   

Abstract

Clinical stage, Gleason score and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels are used separately to predict pathological stage in patients with localized prostate cancer. Because the degree of tumor differentiation has a profound influence on the expression of serum PSA, serum PSA levels alone do not reflect tumor burden accurately. To overcome this obstacle we tested these 3 variables alone and in combinations as predictors of final pathological stage in 703 men with clinically localized prostate cancer at our institution. All patients were assigned a clinical stage by 1 urologist. The Gleason score was determined from preoperative needle biopsy and serum PSA levels were measured on an ambulatory basis. Final pathological stage was determined to be either organ confined, established capsular penetration, seminal vesicle involvement or lymph node involvement. Logistic regression analysis with the likelihood ratio chi-square test determined that serum PSA, Gleason score and clinical stage all predicted final pathological stage well. The results were improved with combinations of the 3 variables (serum PSA, Gleason score and clinical stage) and the combination provided the best separation. From these analyses probability plots and nomograms have been constructed to assist urologists in the preoperative prediction of final pathological stage for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7685418     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35410-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  125 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances: urology.

Authors:  P Abrams; A Wein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

2.  Caveolin-1 upregulation contributes to c-Myc-induced high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Alexei A Goltsov; Chengzhen Ren; Shinji Kurosaka; Kohei Edamura; Richard Logothetis; Francesco J DeMayo; Patricia Troncoso; Jorge Blando; John DiGiovanni; Timothy C Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.852

3.  Correlation of metastasis-related gene expression with metastatic potential in human prostate carcinoma cells implanted in nude mice using an in situ messenger RNA hybridization technique.

Authors:  G F Greene; Y Kitadai; C A Pettaway; A C von Eschenbach; C D Bucana; I J Fidler
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  [Optimizing the use of radiotherapy with IMRT and image guided location of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  F Lohr; M Fuss; U Tiefenbacher; M Siegsmund; S Mai; J M Kunnappallil; B Dobler; P Alken; F Wenz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Determinants of mortality following a diagnosis of prostate cancer in Veterans Affairs and private sector health care systems.

Authors:  Vincent L Freeman; Ramon Durazo-Arvizu; Ahsan M Arozullah; LaShon C Keys
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Correlation of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with pathologic stage.

Authors:  Stephen A Brassell; William R Krueger; Jong-Ho Choi; John A Taylor
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Nuclear morphometry, nucleomics and prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Robert W Veltri; Christhunesa S Christudass; Sumit Isharwal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The changing pattern of prostate cancer in Nigerians: current status in the southeastern states.

Authors:  Paul D Ekwere; S N Egbe
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 10.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.